March 26, 2025

Strategically Vulnerable? Inside Meghan Markle’s Latest PR Move

Strategically Vulnerable? Inside Meghan Markle’s Latest PR Move

This episode explores the calculated timing and emotional storytelling behind Meghan Markle’s latest media rollout. With a new Netflix series and curated social media posts emerging alongside headlines about Prince Harry’s visa status, the episode lays out how strategic vulnerability is being used as a crisis communication tool—and why it might not be landing. The episode breaks down the disconnect between brand aspiration and emotional authenticity, and how perceived relatability doesn’t always translate to real connection.

Through the lens of self-disclosure theory and shifting favorability ratings, the episode also points out the risks of manufactured intimacy in the influencer era. Listeners are challenged to consider whether Markle’s approach reflects genuine strategy or reactive PR gloss. And, as always, the conversation expands into the personal: when life feels messy, is being selectively vulnerable helping—or just a way to dodge the harder truths?

In this episode:

  • Strategic vulnerability vs. authentic connection—what’s the difference?

  • Why Meghan’s content may be polished but still feels emotionally distant

  • A lesson from Ina Garten on how humility builds trust better than beige branding

Want More Behind the Breakdown?
Follow The PR Breakdown with Molly McPherson on Substack for early access to podcast episodes, exclusive member chats, weekly lives, and monthly workshops that go deeper than the mic. It's the insider’s hub for communicators who want strategy with spine—and a little side-eye where it counts.
Subscribe now on Substack → prbreakdown.media

Need a Keynote Speaker? Drawing from real-world PR battles, Molly delivers the same engaging stories and hard-won crisis insights from the podcast to your live audience. Click here to book Molly for your next meeting.

Want more PR + Crisis Management insights?


Follow & Connect with Molly:

Chapters

00:12 - Introduction to the PR Breakdown Podcast

01:15 - Meghan Markle: Balanced Perspective and Brand Analysis

04:27 - PR Theory: Relatability vs Strategic Content Timing

09:31 - Communication Strategy: Authenticity and Vulnerability

13:11 - Netflix Show Review: Beige but Fine

19:00 - Final Thoughts and Weekly PR Challenge

Transcript
WEBVTT

00:00:00.119 --> 00:00:09.509
Welcome to the PR Breakdown, the podcast that transforms curiosity into clarity, skepticism into strategy and backlash into trust.

00:00:09.509 --> 00:00:19.922
Each week, we will break down a PR crisis through empathy, accountability and insider insights, helping you build your own indestructible reputation.

00:00:19.922 --> 00:00:25.393
Ready to dive into what's really behind today's headline, let's go.

00:00:25.393 --> 00:00:30.469
Last week I had a live chat with my Substack members.

00:00:30.469 --> 00:00:33.941
I believe it was Chris who asked about Meghan Markle.

00:00:33.941 --> 00:00:40.694
He wanted to know if I'd seen her program yet on Netflix with Love Meghan.

00:00:40.694 --> 00:00:43.027
I admitted no, I haven't.

00:00:43.027 --> 00:00:55.445
I want to, but she keeps falling down the list because something else will come in front of her Apple cider vinegar, which I loved, scamanda White Lotus there's just so many programs out there.

00:00:55.445 --> 00:00:57.372
But this past weekend I said that's it.

00:00:57.372 --> 00:01:02.268
I told everyone on the chat, and specifically Chris, that I was going to watch it.

00:01:02.268 --> 00:01:03.392
So I'm going to watch it.

00:01:03.392 --> 00:01:06.248
I will admit I did not get through the entire series.

00:01:06.248 --> 00:01:08.076
I watched one episode More.

00:01:08.197 --> 00:01:14.852
On my review on that, I'll say this right out of the gate I am not a Meghan Markle hater.

00:01:14.852 --> 00:01:16.781
I am not that creator.

00:01:16.781 --> 00:01:22.120
There are plenty of creators out there who will bash on her and Harry, I'm not one of them.

00:01:22.120 --> 00:01:25.796
I happen to think she has great style.

00:01:25.796 --> 00:01:27.240
I think she's cute as can be.

00:01:27.240 --> 00:01:36.024
I think the Meghan Markle brand the Tig, you know, pre-harry, pre-royal fiasco, was a good one.

00:01:36.024 --> 00:01:41.902
I think she was on her way, but she met Harry, married Harry, and we all know what happened there.

00:01:41.902 --> 00:01:44.367
I cut right down the middle with those two.

00:01:44.367 --> 00:01:48.394
On the one hand, I think they're both fine, you know, separately.

00:01:48.394 --> 00:01:50.849
I think Harry also had a great brand going.

00:01:51.500 --> 00:01:54.168
You know, being the spare certainly comes with issues.

00:01:54.168 --> 00:01:55.572
Same for Meghan.

00:01:55.572 --> 00:01:56.990
She's brought into the royal family.

00:01:56.990 --> 00:01:57.980
That's not easy.

00:01:57.980 --> 00:02:06.903
I absolutely believe that she suffered through a lot when she was a member of that family, a lot of racism, so there is no doubt it wasn't easy for her.

00:02:07.746 --> 00:02:12.241
Having said that, the other half of me watches them in just stunned disbelief.

00:02:12.241 --> 00:02:15.127
I think the moves they make are so perplexing.

00:02:15.127 --> 00:02:17.412
I find them to be curious.

00:02:17.412 --> 00:02:18.881
That's my feelings towards them.

00:02:18.881 --> 00:02:20.122
It's just curiosity.

00:02:20.122 --> 00:02:31.716
I guess if you were to look at labels, you could call them A-list, but their offerings aren't necessarily A-list because they're still trying to figure it all out.

00:02:32.480 --> 00:02:41.974
I also believe that they are victims to fate in the worst way, combined with just poor choices.

00:02:41.974 --> 00:02:48.921
They always seem to screw up the timing of everything that they do, every rollout.

00:02:48.921 --> 00:02:53.413
Every launch they have comes with problems, definitely comes with a lot of scrutiny.

00:02:53.413 --> 00:03:03.388
People do not give these two, particularly Meghan Markle, a break at all, but there always seems to be a combination of just bad timing, bad choices.

00:03:03.388 --> 00:03:05.633
Maybe they just hope it's going to work.

00:03:05.633 --> 00:03:16.045
But I also think they suffer from the same grandiose feelings about themselves that a lot of celebrities and politicians, people in the public eye, think about themselves.

00:03:16.045 --> 00:03:22.228
They think their goodwill is a lot stronger than it actually is.

00:03:22.228 --> 00:03:25.896
Then, when things go wrong, they can point to the haters.

00:03:26.558 --> 00:03:28.984
I'm always curious from a strategic point of view.

00:03:28.984 --> 00:03:32.350
That's why we have the topic this week.

00:03:32.350 --> 00:03:46.373
I always look at Meghan Markle not coming from hate I'm not a hater creator about Meghan Markle and just in general, I'm always looking for the PR lesson, the communication lesson, also the PR for people lesson.

00:03:46.373 --> 00:03:48.283
What's the life lesson that we can learn?

00:03:48.283 --> 00:03:52.862
I want to speak to both of them because I'm a big, obviously a communicator.

00:03:52.862 --> 00:03:56.759
I want to find the lessons too and I share them with my communicators in the audience.

00:03:56.759 --> 00:04:01.890
But I also want to share the life lessons because people know I love doling out advice.

00:04:01.890 --> 00:04:04.567
My poor children, oh my gosh.

00:04:04.567 --> 00:04:06.653
When I say to them life lesson.

00:04:06.653 --> 00:04:10.788
It's like their ears immediately shut down because they know something's coming.

00:04:10.788 --> 00:04:14.330
But I bet if you ask them, they all know that my lessons are actually quite good.

00:04:14.330 --> 00:04:22.064
And my oldest daughter, rory, she's very good about telling me mom, you were right, and I love that.

00:04:22.064 --> 00:04:25.750
Meghan Markle let's look at some PR theory.

00:04:27.019 --> 00:04:33.173
Meghan recently has been diving more into this relatable content.

00:04:33.173 --> 00:04:42.043
She is posting on Instagram a lot more and you may have seen these carefully curated family shots popping up exactly when negative headlines hit hardest.

00:04:42.043 --> 00:04:44.829
Popping up exactly when negative headlines hit hardest.

00:04:44.829 --> 00:04:47.612
There was a post of Lilibet.

00:04:47.612 --> 00:04:53.721
I assumed hands in the flowers.

00:04:53.721 --> 00:04:54.742
We're not seeing a full frontal of the kids' face.

00:04:54.762 --> 00:04:55.725
That's part of the problem with the Sussex brand.

00:04:55.725 --> 00:04:59.541
They want to be relatable, they want people to love them, they want that goodwill.

00:04:59.541 --> 00:05:06.113
But our audiences nowadays they kind of demand that they get a little inside access.

00:05:06.113 --> 00:05:19.906
They want to see the kids, because Meghan and Harry have created this barrier, this moat if I could use a royal analogy there around them for privacy, because they say, as royals, they need it, which is understandable.

00:05:19.906 --> 00:05:25.452
If you want to emote your brand, it's very difficult to do if you're not open.

00:05:25.452 --> 00:05:27.286
That's very, very challenging for them.

00:05:27.286 --> 00:05:31.088
So that's why we're watching them in real time.

00:05:31.088 --> 00:05:33.514
Try to navigate it, meghan in particular.

00:05:33.514 --> 00:05:42.860
Now the negative headlines about Harry and his immigration status a lot of it pushed by conservative media those were starting to hit.

00:05:42.860 --> 00:05:46.641
So all of a sudden we see a lot of Megan content come up.

00:05:46.641 --> 00:05:50.649
Now I can't say that without saying that Megan's Netflix series is out.

00:05:50.649 --> 00:05:53.144
Plus, she has a podcast coming out as well.

00:05:53.144 --> 00:05:57.596
So Megan is in the marketing phase of content.

00:05:58.076 --> 00:06:00.642
But what about adding kids in there?

00:06:00.642 --> 00:06:01.925
Is it a coincidence?

00:06:01.925 --> 00:06:10.865
Is it strategic genius or is it authentic, emotional relatability for branding survival.

00:06:10.865 --> 00:06:13.490
So let's break down what's really happening here.

00:06:13.490 --> 00:06:15.494
First, some PR theory.

00:06:16.420 --> 00:06:21.024
Megan's strategy aligns perfectly with the self-disclosure theory.

00:06:21.024 --> 00:06:31.416
In essence, the more personal, narrative-driven details that a person shares online, the more connected audiences feel.

00:06:31.416 --> 00:06:37.973
Look at your favorite influencers and creators and celebrities.

00:06:37.973 --> 00:06:50.245
That's why influencers have influence, because we and I add myself to the collective, we we let people into our lives and that's what connects in communication.

00:06:50.245 --> 00:06:53.353
And that's what challenges it for Megan.

00:06:53.353 --> 00:06:54.781
Because she can't do that.

00:06:54.781 --> 00:06:57.767
She needs to be as relatable as she can.

00:06:57.767 --> 00:07:09.875
Megan leverages what's known as perceived connectedness, that's, sharing intimate, relatable glimpses of family life to build emotional bonds and shift public perception.

00:07:11.541 --> 00:07:23.740
But here's the hard data, meghan's UK favorability rating continues on a downward trajectory from 55% in 2019 to only 21% today.

00:07:23.740 --> 00:07:38.255
In the US, her support has also weakened amid criticisms and controversies surrounding every effort that she tries, including her trademark, the American Orchard Riviera.

00:07:38.255 --> 00:07:42.788
They did this with the Sussex Royal name and then Meghan just experienced it again.

00:07:42.788 --> 00:07:50.076
That diminishes credibility, that deteriorates trust, and that's why I think Meghan still struggles.

00:07:50.076 --> 00:07:52.742
Some of their endeavors work, but some don't.

00:07:53.283 --> 00:08:03.310
When there is a scrutiny story, like Harry's visa papers heavily redacted, the pivot towards relatable content isn't just charm.

00:08:03.310 --> 00:08:12.353
It is a strategic crisis communication tactic designed to counterbalance the harsh realities of what they are going through.

00:08:12.353 --> 00:08:29.565
Looking a little bit deeper, megan's latest Instagram posts and her interviews with People magazine coincide suspiciously with the release of these redacted immigration documents concerning Prince Harry.

00:08:29.565 --> 00:08:38.455
Also, the underperforming viewership of her Netflix series A lot of the news articles and digital content you see out there.

00:08:38.455 --> 00:08:48.943
You know that the ratings are going down on Meghan, but, in fairness, there was a lot of hype about Meghan and Harry coming out with that first Netflix special.

00:08:48.943 --> 00:09:00.563
So much hype it was the first one, so there's no way this series, the With Love Meghan series, is going to reach those numbers and it doesn't matter if it's Meghan or Harry, anyone, even John Mulaney, of contract they have.

00:09:00.624 --> 00:09:20.903
There's always resurfaced bullying allegations coming out.

00:09:20.903 --> 00:09:30.600
A member of their previous staff, when they lived in Frogmore, I believe, did an interview recently with the 60 Minutes Down in Australia Really hard to combat that.

00:09:30.600 --> 00:09:34.931
There's always negative media attention around Meghan.

00:09:34.931 --> 00:09:37.236
So clearly timing is everything here.

00:09:37.236 --> 00:09:44.452
Reinforcing that in PR, the subtle redirection can be an effective narrative management tool.

00:09:44.452 --> 00:09:49.288
That's why I think we're going to constantly see it from Meghan and Harry.

00:09:49.809 --> 00:09:51.433
But let's not oversimplify.

00:09:51.433 --> 00:10:04.913
Yes, strategic vulnerability works, but is it truly authentic if carefully timed, megan's social media comeback over the last few weeks feels precisely calculated to redirect attention.

00:10:04.913 --> 00:10:08.330
Yet authenticity isn't just about timing.

00:10:08.330 --> 00:10:13.628
It's about consistency and believable, relatable emotional depth.

00:10:13.628 --> 00:10:15.250
Believable, relatable emotional depth.

00:10:15.250 --> 00:10:25.522
Audiences today, particularly Gen Z, quickly discern authenticity from calculated manipulation.

00:10:25.522 --> 00:10:26.745
Megan's challenge isn't just posting relatable content.

00:10:26.745 --> 00:10:33.222
It's making audiences genuinely feel that connection, despite the calculated timing.

00:10:33.222 --> 00:10:43.933
So for communicators out there, the key takeaway is this Real vulnerability, strategically applied, must still be rooted in consistent authenticity.

00:10:44.700 --> 00:10:49.546
Quick pivots and new hires can't instantly rebuild damaged trust.

00:10:49.546 --> 00:11:02.226
Megan and Harry recently announced they have a new comms hire A little under the headlines, if you will, because this new hire is number seven.

00:11:02.226 --> 00:11:06.293
I believe that's a tough one to keep marketing out there.

00:11:06.293 --> 00:11:13.844
They are trying to gloss over controversy as often as they can, but you need genuine communication.

00:11:13.844 --> 00:11:21.672
To do that, you have to thoughtfully acknowledge what's happening out there and you have to frame setbacks as relatable and human.

00:11:21.672 --> 00:11:24.424
Megan and Harry do not have setbacks.

00:11:24.424 --> 00:11:33.892
That's not a part of any of their communication strategy, and we know why and we can understand why because they know they'll be destroyed over it.

00:11:33.892 --> 00:11:38.243
But it could work Now on a human level.

00:11:38.243 --> 00:11:45.946
Megan's pivot reveals something deeper and this is how we can relate from a PR for people perspective.

00:11:46.427 --> 00:11:51.206
Relentless media scrutiny can drive people towards emotional coping strategies.

00:11:51.206 --> 00:11:56.506
Whether it's media scrutiny or just life scrutiny, like your friends or everybody wants to know something.

00:11:56.506 --> 00:12:02.133
Social media, family narratives and personal reflections aren't just PR tools.

00:12:02.133 --> 00:12:08.712
They're genuine methods people can use to reclaim their sense of identity and also to control under pressure.

00:12:08.712 --> 00:12:17.214
Think about the conversations you have with friends or your friend's kids or your friend's parents, depending on how old you are.

00:12:17.919 --> 00:12:22.952
When someone tells you a story, their side of the story, how many times do you listen to it?

00:12:22.952 --> 00:12:26.126
With a blank face or you're nodding?

00:12:26.126 --> 00:12:30.423
You understand it in agreement, but your head is going oh my God, this person is crazy.

00:12:30.423 --> 00:12:32.328
This person doesn't see what's going on.

00:12:32.328 --> 00:12:34.163
This person is missing it.

00:12:34.163 --> 00:12:35.533
They are missing it.

00:12:35.533 --> 00:12:46.130
Remember that just because somebody tells you something in person doesn't mean that it's an accurate message, because internal dialogue can be very, very different from external dialogue.

00:12:46.130 --> 00:12:57.432
So here is the life lesson for you when faced with criticism or negativity, sometimes the healthiest strategy is to openly acknowledge your vulnerabilities, because you're acknowledging that you get what the issue is.

00:12:57.432 --> 00:13:06.254
Connecting authentically, even when it feels uncomfortable, can provide emotional resilience and shift your personal narrative from crisis to control.

00:13:06.254 --> 00:13:11.611
And speaking of authentic connections, I mentioned that I did watch her Netflix special.

00:13:11.611 --> 00:13:13.225
Here is my review.

00:13:13.225 --> 00:13:16.408
I, for one, am an Ina girl.

00:13:17.111 --> 00:13:18.076
I love Ina Garten.

00:13:18.076 --> 00:13:26.482
One of the reasons why is because she is so honest and she's vulnerable, like she will show if she doesn't know something.

00:13:26.482 --> 00:13:36.894
If you see her interview with guests, particularly when she has celebrity guests on, she will always tell a story that's relatable where she may have failed or done something differently.

00:13:36.894 --> 00:13:39.427
A celebrity is coming in to cook something with her.

00:13:39.427 --> 00:13:44.030
I think Julianna Margulies had a great cod recipe.

00:13:44.030 --> 00:13:46.267
It was a fish recipe that I make to this day.

00:13:46.267 --> 00:13:49.794
It's very, very good and what I love that Ina Garten did is Julianna.

00:13:49.855 --> 00:13:50.460
She's an actress.

00:13:50.460 --> 00:13:51.966
She spends a lot of time in the kitchen.

00:13:51.966 --> 00:14:04.001
She also has her own garden, so Ina related to her on that level and Ina is way better at cooking and growing herbs and everything in the garden than Julianna Margulies.

00:14:04.001 --> 00:14:07.009
But she treated Julianna Margulies as an equal.

00:14:07.009 --> 00:14:11.450
When Julianna would show her something in her recipe, ina would say oh my gosh, I never thought about it that way.

00:14:11.450 --> 00:14:12.503
What a great idea.

00:14:12.503 --> 00:14:18.384
So here she is as a chef telling this actress wow, you're doing something better than me.

00:14:18.384 --> 00:14:21.600
When Juliana would do something that Ina would say I do it a different way.

00:14:21.600 --> 00:14:25.168
When I watched it I thought that's perfect communication.

00:14:25.168 --> 00:14:27.452
Real life relatability helps.

00:14:27.452 --> 00:14:34.826
That is what is missing in Megan's program in her production One.

00:14:34.826 --> 00:14:37.994
I don't know if she's going to get those level of guests on there.

00:14:37.994 --> 00:14:43.192
It'd be nice if she did, if Julianna Margulies came into Meghan Markle's kitchen, that would work.

00:14:43.681 --> 00:14:50.647
But Meghan is bringing in her friends and I think we all kind of know that Meghan doesn't have a ton of friends and that's not a negative thing.

00:14:50.647 --> 00:14:52.191
There are people in life who just don't.

00:14:52.191 --> 00:14:53.201
They don't.

00:14:53.201 --> 00:14:59.904
Meghan started off as one person living with a single parent and going back and forth between her single parents.

00:14:59.904 --> 00:15:02.110
She didn't have a lot of money living in Hollywood.

00:15:02.110 --> 00:15:07.976
Then she went to her Catholic high school, which she posted on Instagram last week.

00:15:07.976 --> 00:15:13.052
She had friends there and then went off to Northwestern in Chicago but then went the celebrity route.

00:15:13.052 --> 00:15:17.881
It's not easy, you can imagine, to keep your friends and to keep the same people in that world.

00:15:17.881 --> 00:15:19.605
That's perfectly understandable.

00:15:19.605 --> 00:15:29.320
But in her royal world, her world, her friend world, got a lot smaller and you could tell with the royal guest list and who we see them with.

00:15:29.320 --> 00:15:36.831
You know, as they bop around but also in their projects they can't get people to join them.

00:15:36.831 --> 00:15:39.403
They're becoming a little bit of a tainted brand.

00:15:39.803 --> 00:15:48.402
So Megan's bringing in her quote, unquote friends or people close to her, but it's not working that well because people are seeing like oh Megan, you don't have a lot of close people in your life.

00:15:48.402 --> 00:15:54.283
I think Megan should start to lean in on that a little because I think a lot of people could relate to that.

00:15:54.283 --> 00:15:56.910
A lot of women, a lot of young women could relate to that.

00:15:56.910 --> 00:15:58.436
I think that would be good.

00:15:58.436 --> 00:16:01.585
Yes, everyone's going to pounce on her, but I don't know.

00:16:01.585 --> 00:16:04.559
I think that might be relatable and then she could get more guests on her show.

00:16:04.559 --> 00:16:06.240
But that's the problem, I think.

00:16:06.240 --> 00:16:07.582
So she brought in her.

00:16:07.582 --> 00:16:08.722
What was he?

00:16:08.722 --> 00:16:09.903
Her makeup artist?

00:16:09.903 --> 00:16:11.365
That's her producer's duty.

00:16:11.365 --> 00:16:18.770
It's not my duty to seek it out, but he was one of her friends, but he was someone who worked with her in her world as a celebrity and it worked.

00:16:18.770 --> 00:16:20.312
I really liked his personality.

00:16:20.312 --> 00:16:24.195
He's really engaging and it showed that they knew each other well and I thought that was great.

00:16:24.195 --> 00:16:26.496
But I didn't like Megan's approach.

00:16:27.639 --> 00:16:37.215
I think we all buy into this idea that Megan is good with doing things at home and cooking and creating things and just the aesthetic of the Megan's life.

00:16:37.215 --> 00:16:39.163
I think we can all buy into that.

00:16:39.163 --> 00:16:46.065
But it's not as if she grew up in Old Sabre, connecticut, from old money and she's been doing this her whole life.

00:16:46.065 --> 00:16:54.000
It's all somewhat new to her and I wish she would lean into that more and really just say, hey, this is part of the new Megan and this is what I learned then.

00:16:54.000 --> 00:17:01.073
So they're creating vegetables, then she's doing a cake, then she's creating a welcome package for her friend and then what was she doing?

00:17:01.073 --> 00:17:01.634
Bees.

00:17:01.634 --> 00:17:07.480
Now we see her beekeeping, working with someone and where she did admit she didn't know what she was doing.

00:17:07.480 --> 00:17:15.428
Most people aren't as fortunate to me to be able to have bees here, though my neighbor does have bees Then she's making candles.

00:17:15.428 --> 00:17:21.028
So she's doing things that aren't really relatable, they're aspirational and I thought, oh, that's cool.

00:17:21.650 --> 00:17:24.063
Not quite the same experience when I was in fifth grade.

00:17:24.063 --> 00:17:27.872
Sister Gratia asked the class could someone make an advent candle?

00:17:27.872 --> 00:17:30.003
And I immediately raised my hand.

00:17:30.003 --> 00:17:32.671
Sister Gratia was a tough, tough customer.

00:17:32.671 --> 00:17:34.982
She was mean, like a lot of nuns back then were mean.

00:17:34.982 --> 00:17:38.569
I said sure, and I knew there was no way.

00:17:38.569 --> 00:17:43.585
My mother was going to sit down and make a candle with me and my dad was a traveling sales guy.

00:17:43.585 --> 00:17:46.192
But I had a grandma who could pretty much do anything.

00:17:46.192 --> 00:17:49.284
And I came home and I said, grandma, I have to make an advent candle.

00:17:49.284 --> 00:17:54.049
I had to do layers of colors, because there's purple, there's pink and it's in layers.

00:17:54.049 --> 00:18:00.025
And Sister Gratia, I think, expected me to do this in like a day, because I came back without it the next day.

00:18:00.025 --> 00:18:00.968
She said what's a candle?

00:18:00.968 --> 00:18:02.332
I said what?

00:18:02.332 --> 00:18:15.972
And then I said, grandma, you got to help me and there was my wonderful grandmother more melting crayons and making this candle and it was a little messy, but my goodness, my goodness, was it a candle?

00:18:15.972 --> 00:18:20.223
So I could do my own Netflix series about how to make an advent candle.

00:18:20.223 --> 00:18:21.548
I love my grandmother to this day for that.

00:18:22.189 --> 00:18:25.765
Megan is doing a lot of things that aren't necessarily relatable.

00:18:25.765 --> 00:18:34.611
If I could give it a one word review, it matches the aesthetic and it's this beige, it's beige, it's fine, but it's beige.

00:18:34.611 --> 00:18:36.989
And a garden has comforting recipes.

00:18:36.989 --> 00:18:41.405
I followed her sea salt chocolate cookies that she made with Willie Geist.

00:18:41.405 --> 00:18:42.911
I've been making them ever since.

00:18:42.911 --> 00:18:44.423
My kids love them.

00:18:44.423 --> 00:18:46.650
Megan is more polished.

00:18:46.650 --> 00:18:51.261
Authenticity ultimately resonates deeper than perfection, in my opinion.

00:18:51.261 --> 00:18:54.184
So the show works, but it's just too too, too.

00:18:54.184 --> 00:19:04.281
You know Now, if you're navigating your own tricky reputation moments, personal and professional, this is the time to jump into my world, my hub, my content.

00:19:05.183 --> 00:19:14.464
I am always looking for ways to help people learn PR and how they can apply it to their work as a communicator or just in their life.

00:19:14.464 --> 00:19:16.028
That's why I've moved over to Substack.

00:19:16.028 --> 00:19:18.353
You can find my hub of content there.

00:19:18.353 --> 00:19:29.964
I have weekly lives, and if you're a member of my community or someone who purchases an indestructible PR playbook, you will have access to my monthly trainings as well and monthly workshops.

00:19:29.964 --> 00:19:36.933
I have one coming up this April, so head on over to my Substack if you want to find out about it.

00:19:37.256 --> 00:19:43.071
Check it out, because your reputation deserves more than these reactive fixes that we see celebrities out there do.

00:19:43.071 --> 00:19:47.048
It deserves, you know, intentional protection and I want to give you that.

00:19:47.048 --> 00:19:49.982
So here's your PR challenge for the week.

00:19:49.982 --> 00:19:52.570
Imagine you're advising Meghan Markle.

00:19:52.570 --> 00:19:56.588
Would you recommend this exact approach that she's on right now?

00:19:56.588 --> 00:20:01.109
Does her timing seem strategic, authentic or a bit too convenient?

00:20:01.109 --> 00:20:03.718
Let's have this conversation online.

00:20:03.718 --> 00:20:05.301
I genuinely want your thoughts.

00:20:05.301 --> 00:20:09.789
Tell me on Substack, hop on the live this week.

00:20:09.789 --> 00:20:17.313
I genuinely want your thoughts, because PR isn't passive, it's ongoing dialogue.

00:20:17.313 --> 00:20:20.500
That's it for this episode of the PR Breakdown.

00:20:20.500 --> 00:20:26.250
Remember, insider knowledge isn't gossip, it's armor.

00:20:26.250 --> 00:20:35.241
So, everyone, stay strategic, stay authentic and turn every crisis into an opportunity to build your indestructible reputation.

00:20:35.241 --> 00:20:45.010
Until next time, keep your reputation strong by eyeballing what other people are doing in your world and in the big celebrity world, political world.

00:20:45.010 --> 00:20:49.707
Look for the insights, and it's usually found in the intentions.

00:20:49.707 --> 00:20:51.030
See you next time.

00:20:51.030 --> 00:20:52.599
Bye for now.