March 19, 2025
From Fairytale to Firestorm: Disney's Snow White Under Scrutiny
The controversy swirling around Disney’s live-action Snow White runs the gamut from casting backlash to political tension. Rachel Zegler’s modern spin on the iconic princess ignited debates over “wokeness,” while leaked photos of diverse actors playing dwarfs gave way to CGI stand-ins, triggering questions about authenticity. Meanwhile, Gal Gadot’s pro-Israel stance and Zegler’s pro-Palestine comments added extra fuel to the fire, turning a simple fairytale remake into a cultural flashpoint.
Disney’s cautious marketing approach suggests an attempt to manage the uproar, but critics wonder if transparency and proactive engagement might have quelled the blowback. The movie itself is drawing early praise, which raises the question: does good storytelling prevail over controversy, or do larger social debates overshadow the final product?
Feeling Panicked When Crisis Hits? Molly's Got You Covered
Follow Molly's secret process that has helped hundreds of clients respond to a reputational crisis. Written by a communicator, for communicators - Molly's Indestructible PR® Playbook guides you through the crisis step-by-step and out the other side. Imagine confidently protecting your reputation when everythiing is on the line.
Don't wait for the backlash to hit. Learn how to make your reputation indestructible. Buy now and download your playbook immediately while your physical copy ships to your door!
You can download a copy immediately while your physical copy gets shipped to you.
Grab the Playbook: https://www.mollymcpherson.com/prplaybook
Need a Keynote Speaker? Drawing from real-world PR battles, Molly delivers the same engaging stories and hard-won crisis insights from the podcast to your live audience. Click here to book Molly for your next meeting.
Want more PR + Crisis Management insights?
- Subscribe to Molly's Substack: https://www.prbreakdown.media/
- Watch Molly's videos and weekly livestreams: https://www.youtube.com/mollymcpherson
- Work with Molly: ...
Chapters
00:12 - Snow White's Controversial Reimagining
03:38 - Casting Controversies and Backlash
05:14 - The Seven Dwarves Dilemma
08:46 - Political Tensions Between Co-Stars
12:36 - Disney's PR Strategy: Scaling Back
14:30 - Crisis Communication Lessons
24:30 - Final Thoughts and Audience Question
Transcript
WEBVTT
00:00:00.119 --> 00:00:08.990
This weekend, a once-blockbuster movie will finally hit movie theaters, and that's too bad, because the reviews are pretty good.
00:00:08.990 --> 00:00:22.013
One online reviewer wrote of the film, quote it is not only one of their best live-action remakes in years, but it's also a film that recaptures the magic of the 1937 movie.
00:00:22.013 --> 00:00:27.810
Rachel Zegler is Snow White and she delivers such a magical performance.
00:00:27.810 --> 00:00:28.371
End quote.
00:00:28.371 --> 00:00:35.070
But Rachel Zegler is one of the many reasons why this film hit the skids well before its release.
00:00:35.482 --> 00:00:37.679
I just mean that it's no longer 1937.
00:00:37.679 --> 00:00:42.659
And Penry absolutely wrote a Snow White that is not going to be saved by the prince.
00:00:42.659 --> 00:00:46.271
She's not going to be saved by the prince and she's not going to be dreaming about true love.
00:00:46.271 --> 00:00:49.042
She's dreaming about becoming the leader she knows she can be.
00:00:50.889 --> 00:00:52.033
Welcome to the PR Breakdown.
00:00:52.033 --> 00:00:53.396
I'm your host, molly McPherson.
00:00:53.396 --> 00:00:57.908
Today's episode topic comes to you on the recommendation of one of my listeners.
00:00:57.908 --> 00:00:59.331
Thank you, artie.
00:00:59.912 --> 00:01:13.112
Whether you are likely walking like Artie, driving your car or listening to this podcast on YouTube at work, let's dive headfirst into the whirlwind of controversy surrounding this movie.
00:01:13.112 --> 00:01:20.469
The Snow White story touches on everything that's on our minds these days Political commentary, the whole wokeness debate.
00:01:20.469 --> 00:01:26.090
What it should be focusing on only is who is the fairest of them all.
00:01:26.090 --> 00:01:28.222
Let's jump right in to the hit list.
00:01:28.222 --> 00:01:29.727
Let's start with the casting.
00:01:30.328 --> 00:01:37.027
Disney's decision to cast Rachel Zegler, a Latina actress, as Snow White raised immediate eyebrows.
00:01:37.027 --> 00:01:43.245
Traditionally, as you all know, snow White is described as having skin as white as snow.
00:01:43.245 --> 00:01:49.623
Fun fact, I played Snow White in my seventh grade vaudeville show.
00:01:49.623 --> 00:01:51.867
Was I good in the role?
00:01:51.867 --> 00:01:55.313
Well, I fit the suit.
00:01:55.313 --> 00:02:03.631
Kind of like that Brady Bunch moment when Greg was chosen to be Johnny Bravo and he thought it was because he was a Johnny Bravo.
00:02:03.631 --> 00:02:04.712
But it turned out.
00:02:04.712 --> 00:02:05.941
He just fit the suit.
00:02:07.183 --> 00:02:24.393
I was a 13-year-old, I believe, with dark hair, pasty Irish white skin with freckles, and I could sing the only hiccup I couldn't white it the high notes of Someday my Prince Will Come.
00:02:24.393 --> 00:02:26.575
That's the song that they chose.
00:02:26.575 --> 00:02:37.806
I had to sit on a rock dressed in my costume, look out in the audience, see my boyfriend, who I was dating at the time mortifying, just tragic.
00:02:37.806 --> 00:02:52.062
Also watching my mother wince, I kid you not, mother wince, I kid you not wincing.
00:02:52.062 --> 00:03:05.010
If you remember the 1937 cartoon and the part of snow white, the song someday my prince will come, it starts at the highest octave imaginable it's not a song that sounds like someday my prince will come.
00:03:05.271 --> 00:03:05.812
No, no, no.
00:03:05.812 --> 00:03:11.783
It starts, my prince will come.
00:03:11.783 --> 00:03:14.568
It is so high even at 13.
00:03:14.568 --> 00:03:16.893
Oh, it was just a nightmare.
00:03:16.893 --> 00:03:22.026
You can imagine poor Molly just sitting on that rock, mortified.
00:03:22.026 --> 00:03:24.752
Oh, the drama, the drama.
00:03:24.752 --> 00:03:32.508
But back to the other Snow White, the film and the actress cast in the film, who is a fabulous singer.
00:03:32.508 --> 00:03:35.537
The reviews on her are absolutely tremendous.
00:03:35.537 --> 00:03:41.688
But for some conservatives the Snow White role was meant to go to a white actress.
00:03:41.688 --> 00:03:44.032
Very similar backlash.
00:03:44.032 --> 00:03:48.149
That echoed the uproar over the casting of Ariel in the Little Mermaid.
00:03:48.149 --> 00:03:53.491
That actress, Halle Bailey, was black and she had legs.
00:03:53.491 --> 00:03:56.729
The conservatives had problems with her in the role.
00:03:56.729 --> 00:03:59.127
It's not just the casting that's a problem.
00:03:59.127 --> 00:04:08.711
Zegler decided to make it clear on many red carpets that her version of Snow White is so much more than the romance.
00:04:09.639 --> 00:04:21.451
She's dreaming about becoming the leader she knows she can be, and the leader that her late father told her that she could be if she was fearless, fair, brave and true, and so it's just a really incredible story for, I think, young people everywhere to see themselves in.
00:04:21.839 --> 00:04:25.165
That did not resonate well with a lot of people on social media.
00:04:25.165 --> 00:04:32.244
Critics argued that she was undermining the classic fairy tale, which sometimes, right like a fairy tale, is a fairy tale.
00:04:32.244 --> 00:04:34.488
I found this take on TikTok well.
00:04:34.488 --> 00:04:35.692
Wasn't that difficult.
00:04:35.692 --> 00:04:39.807
It has over nine million views, but this take explains it well.
00:04:40.108 --> 00:04:44.365
Criticizing Disney princesses is not feminist.
00:04:44.365 --> 00:04:53.331
Not every woman is a leader, not every woman wants to be a leader, not every woman wants or craves power, and that's okay.
00:04:53.331 --> 00:05:01.894
It is not anti-feminist to want to fall in love, to want to get married, to want to stay at home, to be soft, to want to be a homemaker.
00:05:01.894 --> 00:05:07.040
None of these things make you less valuable as a person or a woman.
00:05:07.721 --> 00:05:08.283
I like that.
00:05:08.283 --> 00:05:09.665
Take honestly.
00:05:09.665 --> 00:05:14.237
Now next up, the depiction of the seven dwarves.
00:05:14.237 --> 00:05:32.069
Even before the final CGI decision of making all the dwarves CGI, there were leaked photos of a group of diverse actors well, a group seven who were set to portray the dwarves, and these photos were from 2022.
00:05:32.069 --> 00:05:40.211
Now we don't know who those actors are, so they likely, more than likely, signed an ironclad non-disclosure.
00:05:40.211 --> 00:05:53.367
They cannot say who they were, but in the photos it included individuals of varying races, sizes and genders playing the seven dwarves, but these actors were replaced by now, these CGI characters.
00:05:53.367 --> 00:06:00.932
Following all the criticism and the backlash about representation Actor Peter Dinklage everyone loves him from Game of Thrones.
00:06:00.932 --> 00:06:03.355
He did not hold back on this issue.
00:06:03.475 --> 00:06:08.197
They're very proud to cast a Latino actress as Snow White?
00:06:08.197 --> 00:06:10.906
Yeah, but you're still telling the story of Snow.
00:06:10.925 --> 00:06:11.427
White, still Snow White.
00:06:11.427 --> 00:06:12.370
Yeah, seven dwarves.
00:06:12.370 --> 00:06:15.749
Sure, take a step back and look at what you're doing there.
00:06:16.000 --> 00:06:20.112
Disney's response was a little muted.
00:06:20.112 --> 00:06:31.646
The studio reimagined the dwarves as magical creatures, while retaining some original names like Doc and Grumpy, but the decision did spark mixed reactions.
00:06:31.646 --> 00:06:40.052
Many actors and advocates expressed disappointment, feeling that the CGI erased opportunities for authentic representation.
00:06:40.052 --> 00:06:47.685
Like Dinklage said Other people, like the actor who played Grumpy, he defended the move, appreciating the chance to contribute as a voice actor.
00:06:47.685 --> 00:07:01.129
I'm sure had something to do with it, but the controversy is a reminder that even well-intentioned, progressive changes need to be backed by genuine inclusive engagement.
00:07:01.630 --> 00:07:03.903
Stakeholder engagement isn't just for show.
00:07:03.903 --> 00:07:10.550
When it comes to roles that matter, like those for little people, genuine inclusive dialogue is essential.
00:07:10.550 --> 00:07:16.833
The Little People of America, the LPA, provide guidelines for inclusive language and representation.
00:07:16.833 --> 00:07:29.644
Just in case you were wondering I know you were because I was the recommended descriptors for these actors would have been short stature, little person or someone with dwarfism.
00:07:29.644 --> 00:07:35.367
Those terms are considered respectful and accurate when referring to individuals with dwarfism.
00:07:35.730 --> 00:07:37.997
And remember, context does matter.
00:07:37.997 --> 00:07:43.773
No matter which type of inclusive language you are referring to, that needs to be relevant.
00:07:43.773 --> 00:07:50.029
They should ask how they should be referred to because you want to highlight their individuality and accomplishments.
00:07:50.029 --> 00:07:59.300
That's what's encouraged over focusing solely on physical characteristics or race or gender or their ability.
00:07:59.300 --> 00:08:01.985
That's a really important takeaway.
00:08:01.985 --> 00:08:04.589
This applies to everyone.
00:08:04.589 --> 00:08:11.529
When you're referring to any type of inclusivity, when possible, ask individuals how they prefer to be described.
00:08:11.529 --> 00:08:17.803
Some people may prefer person-first language like person whatever it is, ask.
00:08:17.803 --> 00:08:35.634
The next issue the wokeness and accusations and political tensions.
00:08:35.634 --> 00:08:40.970
Beyond casting and representation, the film has also been slammed as quote too.
00:08:40.970 --> 00:08:45.686
Woke Critics claim that Disney is twisting traditional elements.
00:08:45.686 --> 00:09:05.269
So we know what type of critics are saying this, altering both the character of Snow White and the Seven Dwarfs to cater to modern sensibilities, I would add, probably conservatives, but maybe True hardcore Disney adults likely wanted it to be as close to Snow White as possible.
00:09:05.269 --> 00:09:24.224
All of these Disney productions might ultimately end up in Disney World, disneyland in their parks parents and you were bringing kids.
00:09:24.244 --> 00:09:26.436
My kids went to Disney for years, the first time bringing our daughter, rory, when she was two years old.
00:09:26.436 --> 00:09:35.325
And then my mother said yes, the cringer back when I was in seventh grade, why would you bring a two-year-old to Disney, which Nate Bargatze the comedian has in one of his bits?
00:09:35.325 --> 00:09:39.813
The first time I heard it I said, yes, nate Bargatze, I got the same amount of grief.
00:09:39.813 --> 00:09:45.386
But how many of you went to Fantasyland first and stopped at Snow White first, hand raised?
00:09:45.386 --> 00:09:46.288
I would be one of them.
00:09:46.549 --> 00:09:49.705
In addition to that, there was a lot of political tension.
00:09:49.705 --> 00:10:04.753
Gal Gadot, who plays the evil Quinn and she's quite good in this in the clips that I saw, she has been very outspoken in her pro-Israel stance, while Rachel Zegler, snow White, has expressed pro-Palestinian sentiments.
00:10:04.753 --> 00:10:07.884
That's a difficult one to predict.
00:10:07.884 --> 00:10:10.808
Filming set to take place in 2020.
00:10:10.808 --> 00:10:14.174
Fast forward to 2021,.
00:10:14.174 --> 00:10:22.267
Gal Gadot described the situation as a quote vicious cycle and expressed heartbreak over violence, and stating that quote Israel deserves to live as a free.
00:10:22.267 --> 00:10:25.849
Quote vicious cycle and express heartbreak over violence, and stating that quote Israel deserves to live as a free and safe nation.
00:10:25.849 --> 00:10:28.219
Our neighbors deserve the same end.
00:10:28.219 --> 00:10:28.460
Quote.
00:10:28.460 --> 00:10:37.581
She was discussing peace and coexistence, particularly due to her mandatory military service in the Israeli Defense Forces.
00:10:37.581 --> 00:10:44.686
So clearly as a Hollywood actress, it's not surprising that she would come out in strong defense of Israel.
00:10:44.686 --> 00:10:52.291
But Rachel Zegler, on the other hand, has been outspoken in her support for Palestine, and she used free Palestine.
00:10:52.291 --> 00:11:10.890
And that was following the release of a Snow White trailer which, no surprise, sparked significant online debate.
00:11:10.890 --> 00:11:17.668
She also was a criticism of violence against children in October 2024.
00:11:17.668 --> 00:11:22.701
So this is at the height of the conflict, she stated quote I can't watch children die.
00:11:22.701 --> 00:11:23.302
End quote.
00:11:23.302 --> 00:11:26.125
She was referencing the humanitarian crisis in Gaza.
00:11:26.725 --> 00:11:33.750
I stated earlier that there wasn't any way that Disney could have predicted what was going to happen in the fall of 2024 with the conflict.
00:11:33.750 --> 00:11:42.976
But you're casting two actresses on two different sides OK, but they both have been vocal about each side.
00:11:42.976 --> 00:11:48.970
They knew this was going to be a problem even without the conflicts of 2024.
00:11:48.970 --> 00:12:04.660
So the mix of casting and political commentary only served to deepen the controversy and it turned this simple remake into a cultural battleground at a time when there were no easy answers for both sides.
00:12:04.660 --> 00:12:11.333
There were no easy answers for people who just saw it as a massive humanitarian conflict.
00:12:11.333 --> 00:12:16.149
That was a difficult one Disney absolutely should have seen that coming.
00:12:16.450 --> 00:12:19.865
This resulted in reduced marketing of the premiere.
00:12:19.865 --> 00:12:23.072
Amid all the controversy, disney pulled a classic PR move.
00:12:23.072 --> 00:12:26.812
I mean, what do you think they did when this started to blow up?
00:12:26.812 --> 00:12:35.211
They scaled back the premiere on March 15th the Ides of March, the day of backstabbing.
00:12:35.211 --> 00:12:39.203
The debut was stripped of the red carpet rollout.
00:12:39.283 --> 00:12:43.874
They did have press, but press access was tightly controlled.
00:12:43.874 --> 00:12:47.807
Actors were on tightly controlled talking points.
00:12:47.807 --> 00:12:54.394
They only talked about what it was like making the movie, why it was so magical, all the wonderful things about the movie.
00:12:54.394 --> 00:12:57.885
They were clearly instructed not to discuss the controversy.
00:12:57.885 --> 00:13:10.793
I mean, after all, bob Iger, the Disney CEO, has largely avoided directly addressing the controversies surrounding this live action remake During a November 2024 earnings call.
00:13:10.793 --> 00:13:19.125
He didn't even mention Snow White while promoting the 2025 film slate for Disney, and that was a notable omission.
00:13:19.125 --> 00:13:21.048
In other words, people picked it up.
00:13:21.048 --> 00:13:23.013
It was a high budget film.
00:13:23.013 --> 00:13:35.854
It was a film that people were excited to see, but this suggested a very deliberate effort to distance Disney from the ongoing controversy surrounding the project.
00:13:35.854 --> 00:13:38.248
Take a listen to the key message.
00:13:38.460 --> 00:13:50.989
The Disney company can have a positive impact on the world whether it's you know, fostering acceptance and understanding of, you know, people of all different types Great, but generally speaking, we need to be an entertainment-first company.
00:13:52.720 --> 00:13:58.229
Entertainment-first, bob Iger, you're saying entertainment only.
00:13:58.229 --> 00:14:04.369
Despite the flood of negative publicity, the early reviews have praised the film.
00:14:04.369 --> 00:14:06.283
That makes it interesting.
00:14:06.283 --> 00:14:28.552
Disney scales back, which means it scales back from a lot of the social media rebuke, but it leaves a bunch of positive reviews because the movie, despite the controversy, is well-received, but begs the question can critical acclaim and a well-made movie outweigh a mountain of controversy?
00:14:28.552 --> 00:14:30.964
What can we learn from all this?
00:14:30.964 --> 00:14:32.989
What's the crisis communication lesson?
00:14:32.989 --> 00:14:35.201
I thought about it and here's my answer.
00:14:35.602 --> 00:14:40.173
First, proactive engagement on sensitive representation issues.
00:14:40.173 --> 00:14:45.423
Engagement on sensitive representation issues critical.
00:14:45.423 --> 00:14:46.765
You have to know this going in, no matter what it is.
00:14:46.765 --> 00:15:07.784
If you are filming, producing a movie, if you are rolling out a campaign, if you are hiring a spokesperson, if your CEO has a particular take a value, a stance, particular take a value, a stance, you have to prepare for it.
00:15:07.784 --> 00:15:17.644
If your CEO is going to take a more controversial stance or a more liberal stance on something, you, as a communicator, you have to prepare for that, and how you prepare for that is you let leadership know we're going to get blowback for this.
00:15:17.644 --> 00:15:19.047
We need to be prepared.
00:15:19.047 --> 00:15:21.893
What are we going to say about it?
00:15:21.893 --> 00:15:28.312
And then maybe, just maybe, your CEO might think differently about what they're saying or the choices that they're making.
00:15:28.312 --> 00:15:37.129
Disney's casting choices and communication strategies needed to speak clearly to all audiences from the start, and that is a good takeaway.
00:15:37.129 --> 00:15:55.620
When you are rolling out any campaign and when you're rolling out any initiative and there are numerous stakeholders, you have to speak clearly to all of the stakeholders all of them because stakeholder engagement isn't just for show when it comes to stakeholders that matter.
00:15:55.620 --> 00:15:58.966
And third, managing public statements is key.
00:15:59.726 --> 00:16:05.676
The polarizing political views of key figures in this case for Disney, the actors only added fuel to the fire.
00:16:05.676 --> 00:16:08.148
They absolutely should have seen that coming.
00:16:08.148 --> 00:16:10.467
My goodness, that one was an easy one.
00:16:10.467 --> 00:16:13.749
They could have supported their stances.
00:16:13.749 --> 00:16:15.788
They could have asked them to tone it down.
00:16:15.788 --> 00:16:20.812
Whatever it was, they all should have been on the same page.
00:16:20.812 --> 00:16:25.481
They all should have been on the same page.
00:16:25.481 --> 00:16:30.182
And lastly, while scaling back marketing may control the narrative short term, it can still signal deeper issues that need addressing with transparency.
00:16:30.182 --> 00:16:32.726
Always remember transparency.
00:16:32.726 --> 00:16:34.409
It's a controversy killer.
00:16:34.951 --> 00:16:38.484
In the end, disney's Snow White remake is anything but a fairy tale.
00:16:38.484 --> 00:16:46.696
It's a real-world case study on the challenges of honoring tradition while embracing modernity, as well as navigating the.
00:16:46.696 --> 00:16:49.605
My God, the minefield doesn't work.
00:16:49.605 --> 00:16:53.102
I was thinking of the seven dwarves in the mine, but that doesn't work.
00:16:53.102 --> 00:16:53.884
It's not a minefield.
00:16:53.884 --> 00:16:57.221
I could say the mines of today's cultural and political debates.
00:16:57.221 --> 00:16:58.283
No, that doesn't work either.
00:16:58.884 --> 00:16:59.884
I'd love to hear your thoughts.
00:16:59.884 --> 00:17:05.594
What do you think is more important staying true to the original or reinventing the story for today's audience?
00:17:05.594 --> 00:17:08.227
There's more than just one Snow White out there.
00:17:08.227 --> 00:17:09.531
Let me know what you think.
00:17:09.531 --> 00:17:14.325
You can reply to my social media posts or my PR breakdown.
00:17:14.325 --> 00:17:16.307
Take on Substack.
00:17:16.307 --> 00:17:22.207
You can find me there prbreakdownmedia that's the website or you can find me, molly McPherson, on Substack.
00:17:22.207 --> 00:17:25.500
Thanks for tuning in this week to the PR Breakdown.
00:17:25.500 --> 00:17:39.291
Until next time, son, until next time someday, my prince will maybe not come ever.
00:17:39.291 --> 00:17:48.393
Maybe they will come, or maybe we don't want them to come, or maybe, if they come, we sit down and, I don't know, have apple pie.
00:17:48.393 --> 00:17:50.624
It's time for me to go.
00:17:50.624 --> 00:17:51.826
All right, everybody.
00:17:51.826 --> 00:17:55.854
All right, everybody.
00:17:55.854 --> 00:17:57.016
I know.
00:17:57.016 --> 00:18:01.723
Here's to everyone someday finding their love.
00:18:01.723 --> 00:18:04.107
Right Bye for now.
00:18:06.070 --> 00:18:08.335
When this started to blow up, they scaled back.
00:18:08.335 --> 00:18:19.221
So the premiere on March 15th, the Ides of March, the day of backstabbing you might want to check out your history, all about that one.
00:18:19.221 --> 00:18:23.551
But the debut was stripped of the red carpet rollout.
00:18:23.551 --> 00:18:28.227
They did have press, but press access was tightly controlled.
00:18:28.227 --> 00:18:32.153
Actors were on tightly controlled talking points.
00:18:32.153 --> 00:18:38.728
They only talked about what it was like making the movie, why it was so magical, all the wonderful things about the movie.
00:18:38.728 --> 00:18:39.971
They did not.
00:18:39.971 --> 00:18:43.662
They were clearly instructed to not get into.
00:18:43.662 --> 00:18:45.846
They were clearly instructed not to talk.
00:18:45.846 --> 00:18:49.182
They were clearly instructed not to discuss the controversy.
00:18:49.501 --> 00:19:02.112
I mean, after all, bob Iger, the Disney CEO, has largely avoided directly addressing the controversies surrounding this live action remake During a November 2024 earnings call.
00:19:02.112 --> 00:19:10.354
He didn't even mention Snow White while promoting the 2025 film slate for Disney, and that was a notable omission.
00:19:10.354 --> 00:19:12.340
In other words, people picked it up.
00:19:12.340 --> 00:19:29.713
I mean, it was a high budget film, it was a film that people were excited to see, but this suggested a very deliberate effort to distance Disney from the ongoing controversy surrounding the project.
00:19:29.713 --> 00:19:42.126
Iger's reactions to the and which is very, very different from Bob Iger jumping into the controversy with the writer's strike.
00:19:42.126 --> 00:19:50.817
Bob Iger, sitting in Idaho at the billionaire's summer camp, dug right in and blamed the writers and boy did he pay for that.
00:19:50.817 --> 00:19:54.246
So maybe that could be a reason why he's stepping back.
00:19:56.692 --> 00:19:58.842
I mean, take a listen, take a listen.
00:19:58.842 --> 00:20:00.464
What do you think of Iger's stance?
00:20:00.464 --> 00:20:01.948
Take a listen.
00:20:01.948 --> 00:20:10.269
What do you Take a listen to the key message Despite the flood of negative publicity.
00:20:10.269 --> 00:20:19.045
But despite the flood of negative publicity, but despite the flood of negative publicity, the early reviews have praised the film.
00:20:19.045 --> 00:20:21.750
So that makes it interesting.
00:20:21.750 --> 00:20:23.253
It makes it interesting.
00:20:23.253 --> 00:20:43.935
Disney scales back, which means it scales back from a lot of the social media rebuke, but it leaves a bunch of reviews and a bunch of positive reviews because the movie, despite the controversy, is well-received.
00:20:43.935 --> 00:20:51.453
So it begs the question can critical acclaim and a well-made movie outweigh a mountain of controversy?
00:20:51.453 --> 00:20:53.866
So what can we learn from all this?
00:20:54.000 --> 00:20:55.887
What's the crisis communication lesson?
00:20:55.887 --> 00:21:02.974
I thought about it, I've been thought, I thought about it and here's my answer.
00:21:02.974 --> 00:21:08.965
First, proactive engagement on sensitive representation issues critical.
00:21:08.965 --> 00:21:12.430
You have to know this going in, no matter what it is.
00:21:12.430 --> 00:21:30.548
If you are filming, producing a movie, if you are rolling out a campaign, if you are hiring a spokesperson, if your CEO has a particular take, a value, a stance, you have to prepare for it.
00:21:30.548 --> 00:21:45.409
If your CEO is going to take a more controversial stance or a more liberal stance on something, you, as a communicator, you have to prepare for that and how you prepare for that is you let leadership know we're going to get blowback for this.
00:21:45.409 --> 00:21:46.791
We need to be prepared.
00:21:46.791 --> 00:21:49.646
What are we going to say about it?
00:21:49.646 --> 00:21:56.067
And then maybe, just maybe, your CEO might think differently about what they're saying or the choices that they're making.
00:21:57.619 --> 00:22:06.047
Disney's casting choices and communication strategies needed to speak clearly to all audiences from the start, and that is a good takeaway.
00:22:06.047 --> 00:22:22.232
When you are rolling out any campaign and when you're rolling out any initiative and there are numerous stakeholders, you have to speak clearly to all of the stakeholders, all of them, because second stakeholder engagement isn't just for show.
00:22:22.232 --> 00:22:35.152
When it comes to stakeholders that matter.
00:22:35.152 --> 00:22:37.394
Perhaps it's actors, little people.
00:22:37.394 --> 00:22:40.317
Genuine, inclusive dialogue is essential.
00:22:40.317 --> 00:22:48.325
The little people of America provided guidelines for this, provided guidelines for inclusive language and representation.
00:22:48.325 --> 00:22:54.624
Had they and maybe they did work with them, but had they communicated that they worked with them?
00:22:54.624 --> 00:22:56.470
That's how you stop the blowback.
00:22:57.080 --> 00:23:03.413
This has been in consultation and in collaboration with the LPA.
00:23:03.413 --> 00:23:14.333
We're using the referred terms, we're using the recommended terms and these terms are considered respectful and accurate when referring to individuals with dwarfism.
00:23:14.333 --> 00:23:30.432
We cast these actors with dwarfism for these reasons and with early and with those photos coming out that they were cast, that Disney casted actors with diverse backgrounds, race and gender.
00:23:30.432 --> 00:23:40.666
They could have easily spoken to that and they would have given seven actors roles, but they chose to go with CGI, which I'm even just looking in the clips.
00:23:40.666 --> 00:23:43.031
I think it was a poor choice.
00:23:43.031 --> 00:23:44.762
Live action is live action.
00:23:45.284 --> 00:23:47.788
And third, managing public statements is key.
00:00:00.119 --> 00:00:08.990
00:00:08.990 --> 00:00:22.013
00:00:22.013 --> 00:00:27.810
00:00:27.810 --> 00:00:28.371
00:00:28.371 --> 00:00:35.070
00:00:35.482 --> 00:00:37.679
00:00:37.679 --> 00:00:42.659
00:00:42.659 --> 00:00:46.271
00:00:46.271 --> 00:00:49.042
00:00:50.889 --> 00:00:52.033
00:00:52.033 --> 00:00:53.396
00:00:53.396 --> 00:00:57.908
00:00:57.908 --> 00:00:59.331
00:00:59.912 --> 00:01:13.112
00:01:13.112 --> 00:01:20.469
00:01:20.469 --> 00:01:26.090
00:01:26.090 --> 00:01:28.222
00:01:28.222 --> 00:01:29.727
00:01:30.328 --> 00:01:37.027
00:01:37.027 --> 00:01:43.245
00:01:43.245 --> 00:01:49.623
00:01:49.623 --> 00:01:51.867
00:01:51.867 --> 00:01:55.313
00:01:55.313 --> 00:02:03.631
00:02:03.631 --> 00:02:04.712
00:02:04.712 --> 00:02:05.941
00:02:07.183 --> 00:02:24.393
00:02:24.393 --> 00:02:26.575
00:02:26.575 --> 00:02:37.806
00:02:37.806 --> 00:02:52.062
00:02:52.062 --> 00:03:05.010
00:03:05.271 --> 00:03:05.812
00:03:05.812 --> 00:03:11.783
00:03:11.783 --> 00:03:14.568
00:03:14.568 --> 00:03:16.893
00:03:16.893 --> 00:03:22.026
00:03:22.026 --> 00:03:24.752
00:03:24.752 --> 00:03:32.508
00:03:32.508 --> 00:03:35.537
00:03:35.537 --> 00:03:41.688
00:03:41.688 --> 00:03:44.032
00:03:44.032 --> 00:03:48.149
00:03:48.149 --> 00:03:53.491
00:03:53.491 --> 00:03:56.729
00:03:56.729 --> 00:03:59.127
00:03:59.127 --> 00:04:08.711
00:04:09.639 --> 00:04:21.451
00:04:21.839 --> 00:04:25.165
00:04:25.165 --> 00:04:32.244
00:04:32.244 --> 00:04:34.488
00:04:34.488 --> 00:04:35.692
00:04:35.692 --> 00:04:39.807
00:04:40.108 --> 00:04:44.365
00:04:44.365 --> 00:04:53.331
00:04:53.331 --> 00:05:01.894
00:05:01.894 --> 00:05:07.040
00:05:07.721 --> 00:05:08.283
00:05:08.283 --> 00:05:09.665
00:05:09.665 --> 00:05:14.237
00:05:14.237 --> 00:05:32.069
00:05:32.069 --> 00:05:40.211
00:05:40.211 --> 00:05:53.367
00:05:53.367 --> 00:06:00.932
00:06:00.932 --> 00:06:03.355
00:06:03.475 --> 00:06:08.197
00:06:08.197 --> 00:06:10.906
00:06:10.925 --> 00:06:11.427
00:06:11.427 --> 00:06:12.370
00:06:12.370 --> 00:06:15.749
00:06:16.000 --> 00:06:20.112
00:06:20.112 --> 00:06:31.646
00:06:31.646 --> 00:06:40.052
00:06:40.052 --> 00:06:47.685
00:06:47.685 --> 00:07:01.129
00:07:01.630 --> 00:07:03.903
00:07:03.903 --> 00:07:10.550
00:07:10.550 --> 00:07:16.833
00:07:16.833 --> 00:07:29.644
00:07:29.644 --> 00:07:35.367
00:07:35.730 --> 00:07:37.997
00:07:37.997 --> 00:07:43.773
00:07:43.773 --> 00:07:50.029
00:07:50.029 --> 00:07:59.300
00:07:59.300 --> 00:08:01.985
00:08:01.985 --> 00:08:04.589
00:08:04.589 --> 00:08:11.529
00:08:11.529 --> 00:08:17.803
00:08:17.803 --> 00:08:35.634
00:08:35.634 --> 00:08:40.970
00:08:40.970 --> 00:08:45.686
00:08:45.686 --> 00:09:05.269
00:09:05.269 --> 00:09:24.224
00:09:24.244 --> 00:09:26.436
00:09:26.436 --> 00:09:35.325
00:09:35.325 --> 00:09:39.813
00:09:39.813 --> 00:09:45.386
00:09:45.386 --> 00:09:46.288
00:09:46.549 --> 00:09:49.705
00:09:49.705 --> 00:10:04.753
00:10:04.753 --> 00:10:07.884
00:10:07.884 --> 00:10:10.808
00:10:10.808 --> 00:10:14.174
00:10:14.174 --> 00:10:22.267
00:10:22.267 --> 00:10:25.849
00:10:25.849 --> 00:10:28.219
00:10:28.219 --> 00:10:28.460
00:10:28.460 --> 00:10:37.581
00:10:37.581 --> 00:10:44.686
00:10:44.686 --> 00:10:52.291
00:10:52.291 --> 00:11:10.890
00:11:10.890 --> 00:11:17.668
00:11:17.668 --> 00:11:22.701
00:11:22.701 --> 00:11:23.302
00:11:23.302 --> 00:11:26.125
00:11:26.725 --> 00:11:33.750
00:11:33.750 --> 00:11:42.976
00:11:42.976 --> 00:11:48.970
00:11:48.970 --> 00:12:04.660
00:12:04.660 --> 00:12:11.333
00:12:11.333 --> 00:12:16.149
00:12:16.450 --> 00:12:19.865
00:12:19.865 --> 00:12:23.072
00:12:23.072 --> 00:12:26.812
00:12:26.812 --> 00:12:35.211
00:12:35.211 --> 00:12:39.203
00:12:39.283 --> 00:12:43.874
00:12:43.874 --> 00:12:47.807
00:12:47.807 --> 00:12:54.394
00:12:54.394 --> 00:12:57.885
00:12:57.885 --> 00:13:10.793
00:13:10.793 --> 00:13:19.125
00:13:19.125 --> 00:13:21.048
00:13:21.048 --> 00:13:23.013
00:13:23.013 --> 00:13:35.854
00:13:35.854 --> 00:13:38.248
00:13:38.460 --> 00:13:50.989
00:13:52.720 --> 00:13:58.229
00:13:58.229 --> 00:14:04.369
00:14:04.369 --> 00:14:06.283
00:14:06.283 --> 00:14:28.552
00:14:28.552 --> 00:14:30.964
00:14:30.964 --> 00:14:32.989
00:14:32.989 --> 00:14:35.201
00:14:35.602 --> 00:14:40.173
00:14:40.173 --> 00:14:45.423
00:14:45.423 --> 00:14:46.765
00:14:46.765 --> 00:15:07.784
00:15:07.784 --> 00:15:17.644
00:15:17.644 --> 00:15:19.047
00:15:19.047 --> 00:15:21.893
00:15:21.893 --> 00:15:28.312
00:15:28.312 --> 00:15:37.129
00:15:37.129 --> 00:15:55.620
00:15:55.620 --> 00:15:58.966
00:15:59.726 --> 00:16:05.676
00:16:05.676 --> 00:16:08.148
00:16:08.148 --> 00:16:10.467
00:16:10.467 --> 00:16:13.749
00:16:13.749 --> 00:16:15.788
00:16:15.788 --> 00:16:20.812
00:16:20.812 --> 00:16:25.481
00:16:25.481 --> 00:16:30.182
00:16:30.182 --> 00:16:32.726
00:16:32.726 --> 00:16:34.409
00:16:34.951 --> 00:16:38.484
00:16:38.484 --> 00:16:46.696
00:16:46.696 --> 00:16:49.605
00:16:49.605 --> 00:16:53.102
00:16:53.102 --> 00:16:53.884
00:16:53.884 --> 00:16:57.221
00:16:57.221 --> 00:16:58.283
00:16:58.884 --> 00:16:59.884
00:16:59.884 --> 00:17:05.594
00:17:05.594 --> 00:17:08.227
00:17:08.227 --> 00:17:09.531
00:17:09.531 --> 00:17:14.325
00:17:14.325 --> 00:17:16.307
00:17:16.307 --> 00:17:22.207
00:17:22.207 --> 00:17:25.500
00:17:25.500 --> 00:17:39.291
00:17:39.291 --> 00:17:48.393
00:17:48.393 --> 00:17:50.624
00:17:50.624 --> 00:17:51.826
00:17:51.826 --> 00:17:55.854
00:17:55.854 --> 00:17:57.016
00:17:57.016 --> 00:18:01.723
00:18:01.723 --> 00:18:04.107
00:18:06.070 --> 00:18:08.335
00:18:08.335 --> 00:18:19.221
00:18:19.221 --> 00:18:23.551
00:18:23.551 --> 00:18:28.227
00:18:28.227 --> 00:18:32.153
00:18:32.153 --> 00:18:38.728
00:18:38.728 --> 00:18:39.971
00:18:39.971 --> 00:18:43.662
00:18:43.662 --> 00:18:45.846
00:18:45.846 --> 00:18:49.182
00:18:49.501 --> 00:19:02.112
00:19:02.112 --> 00:19:10.354
00:19:10.354 --> 00:19:12.340
00:19:12.340 --> 00:19:29.713
00:19:29.713 --> 00:19:42.126
00:19:42.126 --> 00:19:50.817
00:19:50.817 --> 00:19:54.246
00:19:56.692 --> 00:19:58.842
00:19:58.842 --> 00:20:00.464
00:20:00.464 --> 00:20:01.948
00:20:01.948 --> 00:20:10.269
00:20:10.269 --> 00:20:19.045
00:20:19.045 --> 00:20:21.750
00:20:21.750 --> 00:20:23.253
00:20:23.253 --> 00:20:43.935
00:20:43.935 --> 00:20:51.453
00:20:51.453 --> 00:20:53.866
00:20:54.000 --> 00:20:55.887
00:20:55.887 --> 00:21:02.974
00:21:02.974 --> 00:21:08.965
00:21:08.965 --> 00:21:12.430
00:21:12.430 --> 00:21:30.548
00:21:30.548 --> 00:21:45.409
00:21:45.409 --> 00:21:46.791
00:21:46.791 --> 00:21:49.646
00:21:49.646 --> 00:21:56.067
00:21:57.619 --> 00:22:06.047
00:22:06.047 --> 00:22:22.232
00:22:22.232 --> 00:22:35.152
00:22:35.152 --> 00:22:37.394
00:22:37.394 --> 00:22:40.317
00:22:40.317 --> 00:22:48.325
00:22:48.325 --> 00:22:54.624
00:22:54.624 --> 00:22:56.470
00:22:57.080 --> 00:23:03.413
00:23:03.413 --> 00:23:14.333
00:23:14.333 --> 00:23:30.432
00:23:30.432 --> 00:23:40.666
00:23:40.666 --> 00:23:43.031
00:23:43.031 --> 00:23:44.762
00:23:45.284 --> 00:23:47.788