257: Web of Fury: The Hidden Forces Fueling Online Anger and Viral Vengeance

Transcript

WEBVTT

00:00:00.281 --> 00:00:10.708
Every single day my tiktok account is tagged numerous times by people looking for my take on situations that seemingly warrants an apology.

00:00:10.708 --> 00:00:15.319
These tags likely come my way for what.

00:00:15.319 --> 00:00:22.257
I suppose some people assume I have expertise in analyzing corporate and celebrity apologies.

00:00:22.257 --> 00:00:27.399
I by no means think I'm the best at doing this, but it's something that I think about and look at frequently.

00:00:27.399 --> 00:00:36.344
What stands out to me in the majority of the videos that people tag me on is this prevailing sentiment of anger.

00:00:36.344 --> 00:00:42.255
People are demanding either justice or an explanation.

00:00:42.255 --> 00:00:51.493
So in the video I'm about to play, this woman wants an explanation from a popular clothing brand.

00:00:51.493 --> 00:00:57.072
Be advised, this video contains explicit language, so listener discretion is advised.

00:00:57.441 --> 00:00:58.384
What the actual fuck.

00:00:58.384 --> 00:01:08.286
Vans was on the way to my workout class and I saw a guy frantically throwing these shoes in front of the van store and I stood there like kind of confused and he was like vans just like dumped all of these to throw out.

00:01:08.286 --> 00:01:09.989
And I was like what do you mean?

00:01:09.989 --> 00:01:18.811
Vans literally threw out all these shoes and not only did they just throw out these shoes on the street, in their boxes, they cut them so people could not use them.

00:01:18.811 --> 00:01:26.033
They had all the vans, I guess, out for recycling in these boxes and they cut them so people could not use them.

00:01:26.033 --> 00:01:28.438
These are literally baby shoes.

00:01:28.438 --> 00:01:36.066
He was showing me all of this and I was like they went through and slash every single pair of shoes so that these brand new shoes could not be worn.

00:01:36.325 --> 00:01:38.031
With the homeless population in the city.

00:01:38.031 --> 00:01:39.662
This is absolutely disgusting.

00:01:39.662 --> 00:01:44.653
I'm actually walking by vans now and it's all cleaned up like it's all gone.

00:01:44.653 --> 00:01:51.998
I said to the guy that was dumping all the shoes out like good for you for making a point and throwing all these shoes in front of the store, please tag vans in this video.

00:01:51.998 --> 00:01:59.165
I don't know if this was like a higher up sort of protocol or if it's just something the vans Philly store did, but honestly I will not be going back there anytime soon.

00:02:04.715 --> 00:02:06.599
Welcome to the indestructible PR podcast.

00:02:06.599 --> 00:02:12.502
I'm Molly McPherson, sharing breaking news and pop culture zeitgeist moments that aren't just for social media.

00:02:12.502 --> 00:02:22.288
Each week, I pick a buzzy story, analyze the juicy bits and follow up with a PR lesson, using tried and true media and PR tricks of the trade.

00:02:22.288 --> 00:02:31.222
This episode is going to help you dodge any type of crisis curveball, to help you build a reputation that's not just strong, it's indestructible.

00:02:31.222 --> 00:02:36.110
So why are brands and people flamed on social media?

00:02:36.110 --> 00:02:41.086
Let's look at the realm of anger and what's behind it.

00:02:41.086 --> 00:02:59.830
So, in this digital age that we all live in, it's no surprise that we are witnessing a constant stream of public apologies from major beer brands, reality tv stars and even private individuals who find themselves in the eye of the viral storm.

00:02:59.830 --> 00:03:11.127
Now, speaking of major beer brands, you know, anyone who's a listener knows that I was eyeballs deep into the whole bud light fiasco last week.

00:03:11.127 --> 00:03:17.741
Last saturday, I went to Bruce Springsteen concert and it was a great concert.

00:03:17.741 --> 00:03:34.650
We decided at the last minute to just we have tickets, I tickets earlier in the week that I did not use and I gave those away, because that's what you have to do when you have kids who go to college, when you buy Bruce Springsteen tickets, but anyway.

00:03:34.650 --> 00:04:01.156
But I went with someone and we ended up just driving to foxborough and at the gate we just went to the phone, opened up the app, just started looking for seats and I said I have to go in deep, I have to go to general admission, right in the pit, right there, to watch Bruce Springsteen, because I don't know how many more Bruce Springsteen concerts I have in me, or even as he has in them, and I just wanted to do that.

00:04:01.156 --> 00:04:01.777
So we did that.

00:04:01.777 --> 00:04:11.965
But something that I noticed walking into foxborough is all the beer was bud light and there was everybody in line, you know, for their bud light beer.

00:04:11.965 --> 00:04:14.510
But I come back to this anyway.

00:04:14.691 --> 00:04:22.634
But the reason why I wanted to talk about this topic at this moment is because it comes up so frequently in my work.

00:04:22.634 --> 00:04:37.845
The last two weeks I have been working with clients on their viral outraged moments and I will let you know that I have created a new offering that aligns better with my schedule, which is more of a quick hit.

00:04:37.845 --> 00:04:48.303
So I'm calling it a quick hit crisis communication plan, and this is really for people who find themselves just in the eye of the storm, because that's where crisis communication is right now.

00:04:48.303 --> 00:04:50.951
I write plans for people.

00:04:50.951 --> 00:05:01.170
I'm writing a plan for a client right now, but it is this long drawn out plan to prepare for some type of backlash.

00:05:01.170 --> 00:05:04.848
But what do you do when the backlash happens at the moment?

00:05:04.848 --> 00:05:08.120
So that's why I wanted to focus on this today, because I'm in the thick of it.

00:05:08.120 --> 00:05:22.509
I am in the thick and I just got an email from a client right now who is being savagely attacked online and the psychology behind it, I think, is interesting, so I wanted to share that with you all as well.

00:05:22.509 --> 00:05:25.315
And you also may think well, why does this matter to me?

00:05:25.315 --> 00:05:31.307
I mean, I'm talking about brands and that's where you're going to see it from brands, they're going to be called out.

00:05:31.307 --> 00:05:43.007
A friend of mine just sent me a text this morning, a link to an article about Alice Cooper, who was called out because he made anti-trans comments and he was working with a makeup brand.

00:05:43.007 --> 00:05:44.531
They dropped him.

00:05:44.531 --> 00:05:48.038
So that will be a TikTok later on today.

00:05:48.038 --> 00:06:02.362
But this idea of the call-out and this viral revenge or vengeance or outrage is really such a part of my business right now, so I want to share it with you all and also to keep in mind.

00:06:02.362 --> 00:06:17.408
It's not just for brands, it's not just for famous people, it's for people, definitely, like I would say in my space, it's people who are known to their communities, but more and more people who are just regular people are being called out publicly.

00:06:17.408 --> 00:06:25.050
So I think it's important to understand why people do and understand what you can do if that happens to you.

00:06:25.651 --> 00:06:38.689
Now in the clip that I played in the open that was from Vans and I was tagged multiple times on the Vans video and when I saw it at my age I've been around a number of decades.

00:06:38.689 --> 00:06:42.100
This idea of merchandise being destroyed.

00:06:42.100 --> 00:06:43.644
I have a familiarity with it.

00:06:43.644 --> 00:06:47.081
I've never no, I was going to say I've never worked in retail, but I did.

00:06:47.081 --> 00:06:51.076
Back in the day I worked for Dayton's, which no longer exists.

00:06:51.076 --> 00:06:57.415
I was owned by Hudson's but I would work at their warehouse so I could get the Dayton's discount, which was just the best discount in the world.

00:06:57.415 --> 00:07:03.055
But this idea of destroying merchandise really is not that uncommon.

00:07:03.055 --> 00:07:10.555
But for someone who's young and perhaps who's never worked in retail, she was absolutely shocked.

00:07:10.555 --> 00:07:16.699
Now the person in that video was younger I'm going to put them late college age, early 20s.

00:07:16.699 --> 00:07:32.502
They're walking down the street in Philadelphia and they're absolutely appalled that there would be a pile of Vans, which is a desirable brand, sitting on a sidewalk and all of the waste is clearly what got to her.

00:07:32.502 --> 00:07:38.920
Now she takes her grievance to TikTok, as many people do, and that's why so many people take me on it.

00:07:39.764 --> 00:07:42.730
Now you may be wondering did Vans respond?

00:07:42.730 --> 00:07:49.689
Now, normally when people take me on brands and it happens a lot the company will not respond.

00:07:49.689 --> 00:07:55.588
I was surprised to see that Vans was responding to people taking me on this account.

00:07:55.588 --> 00:07:59.920
So it puts them in a pretty difficult position.

00:07:59.920 --> 00:08:04.110
And what I noticed in their response, so let me read it first to you.

00:08:04.110 --> 00:08:05.555
So this came under.

00:08:05.555 --> 00:08:13.127
So someone tagged me and they said at Molly B McPherson, I guess this doesn't follow your framework, you know, does it?

00:08:13.127 --> 00:08:21.619
And this is what the Vans TikTok account said, quote we will always prioritize donating usable products to those in need.

00:08:21.619 --> 00:08:26.836
After investigating, we confirm these products were deemed unsafe to donate.

00:08:26.836 --> 00:08:37.566
I was surprised that they responded on TikTok and then I was surprised that they repeated that statement over and over and over again on TikTok.

00:08:37.566 --> 00:08:39.630
Now, is that the smart thing to do?

00:08:40.633 --> 00:08:48.974
Now, this is a tough spot for Vans because destroying unsold merchandise is a somewhat common practice.

00:08:48.974 --> 00:08:54.357
They're not the only ones who've done it, but they're the only ones who have to respond to it on TikTok.

00:08:54.357 --> 00:08:56.284
So there are other retailers.

00:08:56.284 --> 00:08:57.409
So I was looking this up.

00:08:57.409 --> 00:09:00.804
I wanted to know okay, what have other retailers done in the past?

00:09:00.804 --> 00:09:03.811
And not many come forward with responses.

00:09:04.392 --> 00:09:19.116
I found an article that was on HuffPo, but they had quoted a 2010 Slate Post talking about high-end clothing companies in particular choose to destroy unsold merchandise rather than donate it.

00:09:19.116 --> 00:09:23.568
So the Slate Post cited fashion journalist Erika Kualik.

00:09:23.568 --> 00:09:35.107
She claimed that she knew a quote very high up and profitable, and quote fashion label that sent $2 million worth of clothing and purses to the shredder rather than donating the goods.

00:09:35.107 --> 00:09:45.331
And the reason they don't want the wares to end up in the unwashed masses or in some unsightly discount bin.

00:09:45.331 --> 00:09:48.677
They don't want to end up on eBay.

00:09:48.677 --> 00:09:54.033
They don't want to end up in a marshals, maybe somewhere, or in a goodwill.

00:09:55.394 --> 00:10:02.292
And if so many brands contributed this practice, then why did Vans take the hit and did they deserve it?

00:10:02.292 --> 00:10:20.221
Well, vans took the hit because someone at that Vans retailer decided to dump all the property in the front of the building as someone was walking by, because when people see brand new merchandise.

00:10:20.221 --> 00:10:21.586
You're going to draw people.

00:10:21.586 --> 00:10:23.249
It's like moths to a flame.

00:10:23.249 --> 00:10:26.576
So did that response work for Vans?

00:10:26.576 --> 00:10:28.807
I'm going to tell you I don't think so.

00:10:29.330 --> 00:10:34.206
Now is it wise for Vans to take their statement, paste it over and over and over again?

00:10:34.206 --> 00:10:35.893
I don't know the numbers on that.

00:10:35.893 --> 00:10:37.580
I don't know if that's the right thing to do.

00:10:37.580 --> 00:10:38.946
I don't like it.

00:10:38.946 --> 00:10:42.034
It's robotic, it's copy and paste.

00:10:42.034 --> 00:10:46.047
It doesn't seem authentic at all and that's what messaging is supposed to be.

00:10:46.847 --> 00:11:03.889
My big bugaboo with this post, however, is that I don't believe it, because this is a fairly common practice with higher-end brands or brands with a label a highly desirable label.

00:11:03.889 --> 00:11:10.442
For Vans to come out and say that it was deemed unsafe to donate.

00:11:10.442 --> 00:11:12.667
That just seems like a downright lie.

00:11:12.667 --> 00:11:15.152
How's a shoe unsafe to donate?

00:11:15.152 --> 00:11:24.077
I believe if it were me and I was running the Vans communication department or social media, I just wouldn't respond.

00:11:24.077 --> 00:11:31.203
I would let it go, and one of the reasons why I would let it go is because so many other brands do the same practice.

00:11:31.244 --> 00:11:32.707
But does that make it right?

00:11:32.707 --> 00:11:56.470
I believe they could get into a place where, if this does grow, they could come out with a statement and acknowledge the situation because some brand at some point likely is going to have to do this and they could acknowledge that they dispose on silk clothing through destruction methods and it's a practice that's consistent with many brands in the industry.

00:11:56.470 --> 00:11:59.859
But maybe now they're reconsidering it, you know.

00:11:59.859 --> 00:12:03.364
Maybe they could atone for it and be more committed to doing better.

00:12:03.364 --> 00:12:10.999
They understand that it's frustrating to people and people may be disappointed in the brand, but then you explain exactly what happens.

00:12:10.999 --> 00:12:16.428
It protects brand integrity and it ensures that counterfeits do not enter the marketplace.

00:12:16.428 --> 00:12:26.970
Maybe you could say but there might be more responsible alternatives, so you could pause on those activities or we're in the process of conducting that review and actually mean it.

00:12:27.635 --> 00:12:38.164
You could state that you're aware that these actions have broader implications, not just for the environment, but maybe for communities and needs, and so promise some immediate actions.

00:12:38.164 --> 00:12:41.190
Maybe we're partnering with charitable organizations to donate it.

00:12:41.190 --> 00:12:47.028
Maybe there are future measures there, initiatives like recycling, upcycling.

00:12:47.028 --> 00:12:56.969
You know something where it is understandable again that you don't want more desirable brands to end up in places where it diminishes the brand.

00:12:56.969 --> 00:12:57.990
It's a business decision.

00:12:57.990 --> 00:13:01.024
Again, reasonable people understand this.

00:13:01.024 --> 00:13:05.081
So that's the type of messaging there, but that's not what we're talking about.

00:13:05.081 --> 00:13:10.413
We're talking about what exacerbates that issue, where people have to make statements like that.

00:13:11.115 --> 00:13:15.144
So nowadays, we're just seeing, you know, with, as I mentioned, you know, all these apologies.

00:13:15.144 --> 00:13:19.859
They're coming out because these brands are in the eye of the storm.

00:13:19.859 --> 00:13:24.745
You know their name is being destroyed online.

00:13:24.745 --> 00:13:31.414
So there's this surge of online anger that targets brands and targets individuals, and it is more than a trend.

00:13:31.414 --> 00:13:34.081
People don't do it just to do it.

00:13:34.081 --> 00:13:38.934
They do it because there's something inside that makes them want to do it.

00:13:38.934 --> 00:13:45.355
There's this escalation of the negativity that's out there because people want to do that.

00:13:45.355 --> 00:13:48.765
So why should you care about this idea?

00:13:48.765 --> 00:13:58.168
Why should you care about the practice Is because a digital environment can be a very toxic environment, and I've worked with a lot of brands.

00:13:58.288 --> 00:14:08.049
I worked with a lot of organizations profit, nonprofit, not for profit when they are dealing with this type of blowback and they're completely thrown by it.

00:14:08.049 --> 00:14:10.134
No one is immune to it no one.

00:14:10.134 --> 00:14:14.722
I've been attacked online and it does something to you.

00:14:14.722 --> 00:14:19.032
It affects you, but I've also seen things where I wanted to attack online.

00:14:19.032 --> 00:14:20.735
Mostly, I want to attack people who come at me in my comments.

00:14:20.735 --> 00:14:25.974
Those are the people I just want to go for him right, but we don't.

00:14:25.974 --> 00:14:26.956
We don't.

00:14:27.577 --> 00:14:35.159
So I've been researching this topic for a while, so I want to give you three reasons that I see on social media every single day and I see it with my clients.

00:14:35.159 --> 00:14:39.405
And, oh boy, like I mentioned, have I seen this with my clients?

00:14:39.405 --> 00:14:42.710
Oh, my gosh, even right now I am in the thick of it with a client.

00:14:42.710 --> 00:14:53.421
Oh, my goodness, they're dealing with just plain old online revenge and it is something to behold, definitely okay.

00:14:53.421 --> 00:15:04.480
So this topic for this week the reason I'm mentioning it is because Eleanor Hawkins I worked with her before, so she Add it's the newsletter for coms, for axios.

00:15:04.480 --> 00:15:05.922
It's a terrific newsletter.

00:15:05.922 --> 00:15:08.424
I have a link in the show notes.

00:15:08.905 --> 00:15:18.381
But she did a really, really good take on public apologies and she wanted to look at why companies need to apologize nowadays.

00:15:18.381 --> 00:15:29.719
So she reached out to me and, ironically, we had scheduled the time for this interview and I couldn't meet that time because I was in the thick of it with another client.

00:15:29.719 --> 00:15:34.644
It's someone who's online on tiktok primarily, who is being excoriated online.

00:15:34.644 --> 00:15:48.927
I was in the middle of our response and I couldn't do that interview with her, so we rescheduled it and when I came to that interview I thought, oh, I have such a fresher perspective on it right now, and so she had asked me about you know why these things happen?

00:15:48.966 --> 00:15:53.797
And I had told her and she quoted me that the social media fire storms.

00:15:53.797 --> 00:15:58.982
I was going with the fire theme and flaming on social media, so you'll hear that a lot nowadays.

00:15:58.982 --> 00:16:05.289
I am not of the storm and the I while I just did just mention the eye of the hurricane, didn't I?

00:16:05.289 --> 00:16:08.933
But trying to get away from the storm metaphors, because every crisis person use that.

00:16:08.933 --> 00:16:10.657
I'm talking about Fire.

00:16:10.657 --> 00:16:15.043
But what I was mentioning to her is the social media.

00:16:15.043 --> 00:16:19.568
Fire storms can envelope, like the brands you know, and consume their reputation.

00:16:19.568 --> 00:16:24.318
It just, you know, absolutely Incinerate the reputation and it happens quickly.

00:16:24.318 --> 00:16:29.366
But what is fueling that to is on social media.

00:16:29.366 --> 00:16:34.620
It's created in a way that these happen more frequently.

00:16:35.181 --> 00:16:43.076
So Eleanor had cited in her story that there is a correlation between what's read and what's posted.

00:16:43.076 --> 00:16:54.865
So she cited a 2014 study from preceding of the national academy of sciences that predates tiktok, which is a now highly personalized algorithm.

00:16:54.865 --> 00:17:03.163
It's much different than face book, much different than reddit, where it's driven a lot by the recency of a post.

00:17:03.163 --> 00:17:07.212
You know how recent was that post and how many people like that recent post.

00:17:07.212 --> 00:17:14.808
But when there's more negativity attached to that post, there's more attention placed on it.

00:17:15.641 --> 00:17:35.470
So she quoted me as saying that's why more people need to be prepared to quickly explain issues, apologies or acknowledgements, because if there's a lack of an apology or lack of acknowledgement, there will be retribution and people will deem the lack of apology as yet another grievance, so they'll need to apologize even more.

00:17:35.470 --> 00:17:38.994
That wasn't a great quote, but anyway, but that's what I was talking about.

00:17:38.994 --> 00:18:02.602
So these firestorms that are happening now, they are happening in a way that really create problems for brands, and so the surge of online anger has significant implications, and I would say there was a long, long long time and we're still there where brands and people reflexively felt they had to apologize immediately, believe it or not.

00:18:02.602 --> 00:18:13.185
Even though I'm known as a apology queen not self appointed by any means, I'm just basing that on my tags that people are constantly, you know, sending me, which I appreciate, but I am at the place now.

00:18:13.185 --> 00:18:15.271
I don't feel like everybody needs to apologize.

00:18:15.271 --> 00:18:20.327
We need to explain more, we need to go to the explanation.

00:18:20.327 --> 00:18:23.775
It's not really an apology, but we acknowledge it.

00:18:23.775 --> 00:18:26.759
You know again, the indestructible PR framework.

00:18:27.821 --> 00:18:29.403
You want to do the OPE?

00:18:29.403 --> 00:18:30.646
Yeah, you know me.

00:18:30.646 --> 00:18:31.627
That's the first time.

00:18:31.627 --> 00:18:35.315
I just realized it this morning when I was looking at own and explain it and promise it.

00:18:35.315 --> 00:18:37.597
I thought I need an acronym that's easy.

00:18:37.597 --> 00:18:38.259
Like how could I do this?

00:18:38.259 --> 00:18:43.570
Like, oh, does this come up with a word now OPE?

00:18:43.570 --> 00:18:45.273
Now, I could put an R in front of it.

00:18:45.273 --> 00:18:47.239
I'm gonna do my thinking with all of you right now.

00:18:47.239 --> 00:18:50.122
Should I call it rope, respond?

00:18:50.122 --> 00:18:52.904
Oh, how to respond on it?

00:18:52.904 --> 00:18:55.807
Explain it, promise it.

00:18:55.807 --> 00:18:57.289
That's not rope.

00:18:57.289 --> 00:19:00.313
Okay, I need to rethink this acronym.

00:19:00.313 --> 00:19:05.882
If anyone can come up with an acronym for me or help me make this easier, feel free to send it my way.

00:19:06.461 --> 00:19:18.935
But let's talk about now the three reasons why I think there's this proliferation of online anger that's aimed at brands and aimed at you potentially.

00:19:18.935 --> 00:19:19.861
Now.

00:19:19.861 --> 00:19:22.444
So much of it when I explain it to clients.

00:19:22.444 --> 00:19:30.585
Like just yesterday, this is how I broke it down with a client who's dealing with An issue with employees.

00:19:30.585 --> 00:19:43.375
So I want to keep this as private as possible, because I have Disclosures with all my clients, but they're dealing with an employee issue that has definitely spread into the public space and I told this client.

00:19:43.375 --> 00:19:50.467
There's different levels of it, like we just don't want to get to certain digital levels and it didn't.

00:19:50.967 --> 00:20:05.384
So I was focusing on you know why this was happening in the client I'm dealing with this team, but the one client who's the face of it, really taking everything personally, like tears, and I explained you know, what you are going through is very, very personal.

00:20:05.384 --> 00:20:17.182
That's not that different than a divorce, and they were expecting the separation of business to happen More seamlessly.

00:20:17.182 --> 00:20:20.987
But I said look at it like a divorce and an acrimonious divorce.

00:20:20.987 --> 00:20:22.147
How do those go?

00:20:22.147 --> 00:20:23.128
They don't go well.

00:20:23.128 --> 00:20:27.795
There's a lot of outrage, there's a lot of anger, there's a lot of retribution.

00:20:27.795 --> 00:20:30.403
When that happens, I said that's what you're going through.

00:20:30.403 --> 00:20:35.673
You're going through a divorce and you're both fighting over custody for the kids and it's getting ugly.

00:20:35.673 --> 00:20:47.134
And part of the reason why it's ugly is because people are now taking sides or they see something happening and they're going to come and swarm, like in the case of this client.

00:20:47.134 --> 00:20:56.440
So these are the three reasons why I think there is such all these crises now have so much viral outrage attached to it.

00:20:56.980 --> 00:21:08.023
The first point is this it's animinity in so many cases, because animinity affords the people on the internet the ability to express themselves without any consequence.

00:21:08.023 --> 00:21:13.529
They can say whatever they want because they have this invisibility cloak around them.

00:21:13.529 --> 00:21:15.152
So it emboldens people.

00:21:15.152 --> 00:21:22.539
They're more aggressive, they're more confrontational than they would be face to face or if their name was attached to it or if their profile photo is there.

00:21:22.539 --> 00:21:31.660
So this disconnect between online actions in real world repercussions, it kind of fuels this willingness to express anger more openly.

00:21:33.300 --> 00:21:36.705
Where we see this is reddit more and more with my clients now.

00:21:36.705 --> 00:21:41.232
Wow, more and more I've become a reddit queen.

00:21:41.232 --> 00:21:43.556
When I have to like, just download and chill.

00:21:43.556 --> 00:21:50.922
Now when I go on my phone like, okay, just gotta look at stuff, I just go to reddit Because reddit one helps me out of my job because I get in the psychology people.

00:21:50.922 --> 00:21:54.203
But you can learn so much like for my business.

00:21:54.203 --> 00:21:58.192
I get asked all the time how can I learn more about crisis comms?

00:21:58.192 --> 00:21:59.178
How can I do what you do?

00:21:59.178 --> 00:22:00.122
You want to know what you do?

00:22:00.122 --> 00:22:00.825
Go to Reddit.

00:22:00.825 --> 00:22:02.368
Go to Reddit and figure out.

00:22:02.368 --> 00:22:03.090
How would you fix that.

00:22:03.090 --> 00:22:05.136
So animinity is number one.

00:22:05.136 --> 00:22:10.436
Number two is instant gratification and the lack of repercussions.

00:22:11.164 --> 00:22:26.253
Social media platforms are designed for this quick, reactive responses, so the ease where someone can just like something, post something, share something, comment on something, show outrage on something.

00:22:26.253 --> 00:22:31.113
It just creates and fosters this culture of instant gratification.

00:22:31.113 --> 00:22:32.329
I want it.

00:22:32.329 --> 00:22:32.992
I want it now.

00:22:32.992 --> 00:22:34.439
I feel this way.

00:22:34.439 --> 00:22:35.904
I got to put it out right now.

00:22:36.626 --> 00:22:42.030
And when people have anger, they want to put it out Like, imagine, just like fighting someone on text.

00:22:42.030 --> 00:22:47.345
If you've gone through something where you've gone through a confrontation with a person, think of how you've let that out.

00:22:47.345 --> 00:22:49.090
Is it texting?

00:22:49.090 --> 00:22:50.695
Is it screaming at them?

00:22:50.695 --> 00:22:51.719
Is it yelling at them?

00:22:51.719 --> 00:22:55.733
Well, people are doing the same thing, but they're doing it on social media.

00:22:55.733 --> 00:22:57.470
But what makes it better?

00:22:57.470 --> 00:23:15.509
So think if you've ever been in a situation where someone has wronged you and you were able to look them in the eye and tell them what they did, and tell them I am onto you, I know what you're doing and this is what I think of you.

00:23:15.509 --> 00:23:24.297
It feels so good in that moment, but one of the let downs is there's no one else to enjoy that with you.

00:23:24.297 --> 00:23:28.134
There's no one else standing right next to you, going nicely done.

00:23:28.134 --> 00:23:29.296
Don't you feel better?

00:23:29.296 --> 00:23:33.428
No, but you know where that happens Social media.

00:23:33.428 --> 00:23:44.917
Imagine just letting it all out and then having all these other people cheer you on and say the same thing and pile on and pile on and pile on.

00:23:45.685 --> 00:23:50.857
That is one of the biggest reasons why there is viral outrage.

00:23:50.857 --> 00:23:56.246
And three, this idea of tribalism.

00:23:56.246 --> 00:24:06.435
So these online platforms I just heard it again with you know, talking with my client and their team it's an echo chamber, it is an absolute echo chamber.

00:24:06.435 --> 00:24:14.555
It reinforces beliefs that certain people have and their opinions I'm watching it now and Reddit, the opinions about my client.

00:24:14.555 --> 00:24:18.791
They're wrong, they're wrong and I see it over and over and over.

00:24:18.791 --> 00:24:21.038
It's just perpetuating over and over and over.

00:24:21.038 --> 00:24:22.347
They're just lies.

00:24:22.347 --> 00:24:27.138
But when someone sees someone's outrage, oh my gosh, well, they must be right.

00:24:27.138 --> 00:24:32.011
So this tribalism fuels this collective anger.

00:24:32.153 --> 00:24:33.719
And where does tribalism exist?

00:24:33.719 --> 00:24:45.232
In like-minded communities, where everyone is drawn to that community, and that's where Reddit is really, really big with that and emotion becomes like a group sentiment.

00:24:45.232 --> 00:24:53.317
So instead of having a bunch of individual sentiments, they group together and then they target a brand or a celebrity.

00:24:53.317 --> 00:25:01.325
They target Bud Light, or they support Kid Rock, or they go after Bud Light, or they go after Kid Rock.

00:25:01.325 --> 00:25:06.924
And isn't it interesting that recently there was a photo TMC posted a photo of Kid Rock drinking beer.

00:25:06.924 --> 00:25:09.612
Can anyone guess the brand he was drinking?

00:25:09.612 --> 00:25:12.538
Oh yeah, bud Light.

00:25:13.628 --> 00:25:14.692
Now, those were the three reasons.

00:25:14.692 --> 00:25:28.540
Now there's one more underlying reason that adds to all of those points that I just mentioned, something that makes it worse, and this is something that Eleanor cited in her newsletter.

00:25:28.540 --> 00:25:45.413
As a matter of fact, she put it in her headline because I told her, and I had just gotten off the phone with my client, when I hopped down the phone with her and I told her, I said this is the biggest problem and she took it and ran with it, which is the reason why her newsletter received incredible traction.

00:25:45.413 --> 00:25:48.803
I mean that addition of it because of the topic.

00:25:48.803 --> 00:25:49.644
It's so well written.

00:25:49.644 --> 00:25:52.271
But I mentioned the algorithm.

00:25:53.394 --> 00:25:57.625
This is driving social media platforms to amplify negative commentary.

00:25:57.625 --> 00:26:03.016
It just creates this pressing need for what I do.

00:26:03.016 --> 00:26:07.625
It's creating swift, clear apologies or explanations.

00:26:07.625 --> 00:26:11.237
You've got to be on it, alright.

00:26:11.237 --> 00:26:12.160
So what's the solution?

00:26:12.160 --> 00:26:13.644
What do you do if this happens to you?

00:26:13.644 --> 00:26:23.713
I mean, clearly, you do need an effective crisis management strategy, and it's not just for companies, it's not just for brands, it's for people, just for regular people.

00:26:23.713 --> 00:26:27.648
Everybody needs to know how to respond, even on social media.

00:26:27.648 --> 00:26:32.257
I am now getting calls from people who I follow on social media.

00:26:32.257 --> 00:26:37.380
They're just a person, but then something happens to them and now they're calling me.

00:26:37.380 --> 00:26:38.304
Like what do I say?

00:26:38.304 --> 00:26:38.644
What do I do?

00:26:38.644 --> 00:26:40.126
So my job now?

00:26:40.126 --> 00:26:41.490
I have hourly consulting.

00:26:41.490 --> 00:26:47.500
It's like partly therapy and part professional therapy personal and professional.

00:26:47.500 --> 00:26:49.588
So these are the things that you should do.

00:26:49.910 --> 00:27:16.576
With the complexity of online anger, driven by the factors I just mentioned Anomity, instant gratification, tribalism you have to approach the issue in a more practical, critical thinking way, one you have to have a strategy, a crisis communication strategy, in place to tackle it, and the easiest way to do it is just use my indestructible PR framework.

00:27:16.576 --> 00:27:18.701
You know?

00:27:18.701 --> 00:27:19.602
Oh, pee pee.

00:27:19.602 --> 00:27:25.249
Yeah, you know me, I'm just going for now on, explain it, promise it.

00:27:25.249 --> 00:27:27.290
Okay, just own up to what happened.

00:27:27.290 --> 00:27:28.952
Explain what happened in the promise.

00:27:28.952 --> 00:27:30.375
Either do better or differently.

00:27:30.375 --> 00:27:33.482
Whatever it is, it's as simple as that.

00:27:33.482 --> 00:27:36.050
That is a crisis communication strategy.

00:27:36.050 --> 00:27:38.982
It speaks to it so you can move on.

00:27:39.643 --> 00:27:43.426
You can also directly engage with people who are expressing anger.

00:27:43.426 --> 00:27:48.672
I don't like getting into the thick of it when people are coming at you online and they're just angry.

00:27:48.672 --> 00:27:53.576
I tell my clients like in the case of this client right now and then another one that I had the previous week.

00:27:53.576 --> 00:27:54.861
Don't die been.

00:27:54.861 --> 00:27:55.603
You don't need to.

00:27:55.603 --> 00:27:57.204
Just don't for now.

00:27:57.204 --> 00:27:58.928
I know it's hard, it's difficult.

00:27:58.928 --> 00:28:00.750
We have your response.

00:28:00.750 --> 00:28:05.663
We just need to wait until this thing happens and then will all the truth will be revealed.

00:28:05.663 --> 00:28:09.290
It's really difficult to sit in that gray area and I understand that.

00:28:09.951 --> 00:28:15.866
But professionally, you do need to respond, and when you do now, you need to engage in that dialogue.

00:28:15.866 --> 00:28:25.828
So, when possible, engage directly with those expressing anger Not the trollish anger, but people.

00:28:25.828 --> 00:28:39.994
Perhaps if your brand, if your person on social media, maybe you're an organization that's real facebook driven or you have a community, maybe facebook group, go in there, where people know you in your community, and start talking it out and explain it.

00:28:39.994 --> 00:28:42.002
Do it with the people who are reasonable.

00:28:42.002 --> 00:28:43.707
Don't just respond to super fans.

00:28:43.707 --> 00:28:47.594
Do it with reasonable people who understand you will make you feel better.

00:28:47.594 --> 00:28:55.729
So don't feed the trolls, but aim to engage with those who's anger or confusion stems from a legitimate grievance.

00:28:55.729 --> 00:28:59.573
So maybe you did do something wrong or maybe something you said was taken out of context.

00:28:59.573 --> 00:29:01.454
This will give you a place to explain it.

00:29:01.915 --> 00:29:08.686
And finally, you do want to check, though, if you are a brand yourself or you work for an organization.

00:29:08.686 --> 00:29:27.016
You need to have that type of moderation, that third party moderation, where you have a distance and also the ability to fact check, the ability to look at what's being said, and you need a person who's unbiased to add that layer of scrutiny.

00:29:27.016 --> 00:29:36.904
If you get the person who's emotional you know I was talking to someone this week who you know, the client I'm dealing with what's the go in and do the back and forth and talk, which I get part of it?

00:29:36.904 --> 00:29:41.329
They need to speak to their people, they need to just let it all out, right.

00:29:41.329 --> 00:29:55.554
But when that person does it in only one community, the safe community, and no where else, it gives the impression that they only want to respond to the people who love them and not to the people who have legitimate grievances.

00:29:55.554 --> 00:30:05.191
So it's a bit of a dance, but you want to have someone in there at least that can be unbiased and add that other layer of scrutiny that you may need.

00:30:05.832 --> 00:30:13.585
Now, if you adopt these ideas, these methods, you can handle any incident that happens to you.

00:30:13.585 --> 00:30:30.555
You can effectively at least calm yourself down and work towards creating A better culture for you or your brand or your business organization that can minimize this propensity for the anger to just take hold in your community in the first place.

00:30:30.555 --> 00:30:34.226
The end of every episode, I include one indestructible p?

00:30:34.226 --> 00:30:34.685
R?

00:30:34.685 --> 00:30:35.047
T.

00:30:35.047 --> 00:30:39.575
It is a practical take away to help you build an indestructible reputation.

00:30:40.401 --> 00:30:48.114
So effective strategy to dismiss online anger and just feel better about yourself is to practice cognitive reframing.

00:30:48.114 --> 00:31:02.615
This technique helps you to alter your perception of the situation by just viewing it through a different lens, and it's one that diminishes its emotional grab over you.

00:31:02.615 --> 00:31:16.296
So, for instance, instead of viewing an online attack is a personal front, just reframing it as a manifestation of someone else's own issues or stress or ignorance.

00:31:16.296 --> 00:31:23.328
The more you depersonalize the situation, it will reduce the emotional impact it has on you.

00:31:23.328 --> 00:31:35.366
Just remind yourself that the online environment can sometimes bring out the worst in people, and that comments often say more about the commenter then about you.

00:31:35.366 --> 00:31:36.988
And there you have it.

00:31:36.988 --> 00:31:43.996
So I'm eager to hear your thoughts on today's topic, so join the conversation by checking out my social media posts this week.

00:31:43.996 --> 00:31:46.928
Alright, everyone, thanks for tuning in.

00:31:46.928 --> 00:31:47.769
Bye for now.

257: Web of Fury: The Hidden Forces Fueling Online Anger and Viral Vengeance

Listen On

Recent Episodes

communications Episodes

PR Episodes

Browse episodes by category