Download the Indestructible PR® Response Framework and kickstart your effective crisis response planning
June 27, 2023

247: Under Pressure: OceanGate's Titanic Struggles with Media and Public Perception

247: Under Pressure: OceanGate's Titanic Struggles with Media and Public Perception

The captivating story of the missing Titanic submersible and the PR crisis that ensued for OceanGate.  We unravel the media coverage, public perception, and the different strategies employed by Ocean Gate, the US Coast Guard, and other agencies, as well as the roles of social media and notable figures like James Cameron in shaping the narrative. Learn how transparency, timely communication, and empathy were key components in managing this disaster.

We dive deep into the various media strategies used in crisis communication, analyzing how OceanGate and other organizations leveraged social media experts and the challenges they faced in releasing crucial information. We also discuss the involvement of brands like Boeing, University of Washington, Logitech, Blink 182, and The Simpsons in the story, and examine the impact of the press in the coverage. Plus, don't miss the incredible connection between the CEO's wife and the Titanic, her ancestors having been first-class passengers on the ill-fated ship!

Finally, we emphasize the importance of having an online platform dedicated to user-generated content, allowing communities to interact, ask questions, and engage with your audience. Listen in as we explore how such platforms serve viewers and listeners better, providing a unique opportunity for better engagement and insight. Join us for this insightful and gripping episode that not only explores the Titanic submersible disaster but also offers valuable lessons in public relations strategies and crisis management.

Topics covered in Episode 247 of Indestructible PR with Molly McPherson:

- Referring to James Cameron's interview and Cameron's anger towards CEO Stockton Rush

- Focus on money and wealth in ocean exploration

- Tragic ending to submersible 'Titan' used to see Titanic shipwreck

- Vessel had catastrophic implosion, killing all on board

- Tragic consequences of recent billionaire space launch

- Need for a crisis communication plan

- Speaker's community platform called Five

- Missing Titanic tourist immersible and PR crisis faced by OceanGate

- Public relations crucial for crisis management

- Coverage of the event and criticism of the media

- Example of good and bad media strategies during a crisis

Join Molly on Patreon for even deeper dives into celebrity PR strategies and exclusive live sessions!

Follow Molly for daily updates and more PR insights:

© 2024 The PR Breakdown with Molly McPherson

Chapters

00:00 - The Missing Titanic Submersible

11:48 - Media Strategies in Crisis Communication

24:12 - Submarine Crisis and Brand Involvement

35:03 - Community Interaction Platform

Transcript
WEBVTT

00:00:00.401 --> 00:00:08.294
Last week it seemed as if everyone was gripped by the missing Titanic submersible story.

00:00:08.294 --> 00:00:10.346
I was one of those people.

00:00:10.346 --> 00:00:38.313
Not only was I following it just for the drama and for the ticking clock how much oxygen was going to be left for these five souls on board this submersible But I was also interested in the news coverage and how people were following the story based on the facts, what they were told and what they weren't told It was supposed to be a 10-hour journey to see the Titanic shipwreck, but it ended in tragedy.

00:00:39.203 --> 00:00:50.093
After a four-day search for the Titan submersible, the US Navy came to the conclusion that the vessel in all likelihood had a catastrophic implosion and killed all five people on board.

00:00:50.841 --> 00:01:00.731
Welcome to the Indestructible PR Podcast, where we use current events and tested media in PR strategies to help prevent a managing crisis and build an indestructible reputation.

00:01:00.731 --> 00:01:06.980
In this episode, ocean Gate, the company behind the missing Titanic submersible.

00:01:06.980 --> 00:01:16.772
It faced a significant PR crisis, but so did other brands and agencies and the people tied to this disaster.

00:01:16.772 --> 00:01:23.673
Let's examine the Titanic submersible from a media point of view.

00:01:23.673 --> 00:01:33.248
So public relations is a critical aspect of any company's success or their downfall, especially during a challenging time.

00:01:33.248 --> 00:01:49.459
So Ocean Gate, the company behind the missing Titanic tourist submersible they were named that most people had never heard of before until last week when the news reports started to leak out on Monday about the missing sub.

00:01:49.459 --> 00:01:55.480
Now I had posted a video to TikTok Soon after I heard the news.

00:01:55.480 --> 00:02:04.980
I happened to be at a college orientation session listening to information about my kids at college.

00:02:04.980 --> 00:02:13.269
I've been to this rodeo a few times, so I may have been on my phone and a notification came up about a missing sub.

00:02:13.269 --> 00:02:17.311
I don't know how you can turn away from a story like that.

00:02:17.311 --> 00:02:36.479
So I was actively paying attention while I was scrolling my phone And the story the news alerts coming out did not mention really any of the details other than a tourist sub was missing on its way to see the Titanic.

00:02:37.004 --> 00:02:38.500
Many people are familiar with the Titanic.

00:02:38.500 --> 00:02:49.211
Many people are familiar with the Titanic because the movie it's been romanticized by Kate Winslet and Leonardo DiCaprio, by the director, james Cameron.

00:02:49.211 --> 00:02:50.663
Does he play a part in the story?

00:02:50.663 --> 00:02:59.631
Of course he plays a part in the story, but in this episode I want to look at a number of the elements that I was looking at.

00:02:59.631 --> 00:03:06.793
Of course it's under the umbrella of public relations, because public relations is all about the public perception.

00:03:06.793 --> 00:03:19.389
The public perception is related to Oceangate, a fairly unknown company unless you were familiar with Titanic exploration, and also all the brands that were involved.

00:03:19.389 --> 00:03:22.068
Now, i don't need to go too deep into the facts here.

00:03:22.068 --> 00:03:24.500
We all I mean we were all following it.

00:03:24.500 --> 00:03:29.500
Even if you weren't actively following it, you couldn't help but hear about it because people were talking about it.

00:03:30.300 --> 00:03:39.335
What we found out last week, after a number of days of really wall-to-wall coverage on this, that there was a catastrophic implosion.

00:03:39.335 --> 00:03:42.479
So this was a Titanic bound submersible.

00:03:42.479 --> 00:03:43.822
So it was smaller.

00:03:43.822 --> 00:03:53.460
They said it was the size of a minivan that was lost in a search area that was the size of Connecticut.

00:03:53.460 --> 00:03:57.348
There were five people on board, killing everyone.

00:03:57.348 --> 00:04:04.460
From what we can tell instantly Now, this press conference was on Thursday at 3 o'clock Eastern Daylight Time.

00:04:04.460 --> 00:04:09.500
It took place at the Coast Guard Station at the first district.

00:04:09.980 --> 00:04:22.439
Now some people, when I had posted four posts, i think, about this sub-incident And a lot of people were asking you know why more people weren't involved?

00:04:22.439 --> 00:04:25.439
Why were there more search and rescue efforts?

00:04:25.439 --> 00:04:31.048
I mean, there are a lot of opinions out there because of social media, just to get this, you know, piece of it out of the way.

00:04:31.048 --> 00:04:37.192
I mean the reason why the US Coast Guard was responsible for the search.

00:04:37.192 --> 00:04:50.480
So, even though that the wreckage took place, so they're exploring the wreckage the Titanic wreckage is 900 miles east of Cape Cod, 13,000 feet below sea level.

00:04:50.480 --> 00:04:58.500
So now the Coast Guard isn't out there patrolling, but that area is part of the Boston Search and Rescue region.

00:04:58.500 --> 00:05:04.480
So this is, you know, through international treaty with the IMO, there's international maritime organization.

00:05:04.480 --> 00:05:06.146
There's just a lot of details there.

00:05:06.146 --> 00:05:11.172
But, in short, the reason why it belonged to the Coast Guard, the US Coast Guard and not Canada.

00:05:11.172 --> 00:05:12.802
Everyone was there to support it.

00:05:12.802 --> 00:05:20.910
But it was a Coast Guard search and rescue effort And they were responsible for the response.

00:05:22.101 --> 00:05:23.646
Now, what is interesting?

00:05:23.646 --> 00:05:49.072
if you were following the story, so when the news started to break on Monday, so if I was in the central time zone and so it was in the early afternoon that the story was starting to leak out, but now that we've learned, you know, a couple of days later, since that final press conference, that people knew when something happened on Sunday, we know now that it was, as I mentioned, a catastrophic implosion and that implosion happened on Sunday.

00:05:49.072 --> 00:05:55.711
But I was following how the news was being parsed out.

00:05:55.711 --> 00:06:01.872
You know the timing of the news, like when did we hear everything and when was it reported?

00:06:01.872 --> 00:06:06.920
It really did seem like it's a meta moment, right, it is.

00:06:06.920 --> 00:06:09.709
The coverage felt like a movie.

00:06:09.709 --> 00:06:18.187
It felt like we were watching a scripted drama about a scripted drama.

00:06:18.187 --> 00:06:26.115
That was in a movie that was based on facts, you know, historical facts of the sinking of the Titanic.

00:06:26.115 --> 00:06:31.992
It's all quite fascinating, which is, you know, another part of the reason why I think people were gripped by it.

00:06:32.519 --> 00:06:37.252
Now, a number of people had mentioned, you know, on the post, and I did, two lives as well.

00:06:37.252 --> 00:06:41.184
There was some, you know, there's some consternation.

00:06:41.184 --> 00:06:55.225
There's some, you know, some anger really about the fact that there was so much coverage dedicated to this case, when you know there are five people lost at sea and they were, you know, filled with billionaires.

00:06:55.225 --> 00:07:16.608
When there were hundreds of Pakistanis who were dead in the Mediterranean in a migrant boat disaster, there was a lot of people and a lot of people on social media had words to say about that, and on my lives as well, and I tend to be a defender of the press many times because I work with them.

00:07:16.608 --> 00:07:22.821
I also was one of them at one time And it's important to remember someone who also teaches it.

00:07:22.821 --> 00:07:26.774
You know, i'm an adjunct as well And I've just been in this business for 30 years.

00:07:26.774 --> 00:07:28.077
I mean, i started working.

00:07:28.077 --> 00:07:29.922
I actually started working in.

00:07:29.922 --> 00:07:33.879
My first media job was in college, you know, my first paid media job.

00:07:33.879 --> 00:07:36.223
So I've been in this business for a long, long time.

00:07:36.716 --> 00:07:47.360
I think what people forget about news coverage is that news is covered by reporters and editors and news teams right, and they work for a business.

00:07:47.360 --> 00:07:49.622
They don't work for an agency.

00:07:49.622 --> 00:07:53.120
It's not a part of the US government, it's not like Voice of America.

00:07:53.120 --> 00:07:55.661
It is their businesses.

00:07:55.661 --> 00:08:00.266
You know, kate, if you think of Fox News, you think of MSNBC, you think of CNN.

00:08:00.266 --> 00:08:06.827
They all have formats and they all, you know, cater their news to certain demographics and psychographics.

00:08:06.827 --> 00:08:11.446
So that's not to apologize for the press, but I think that's just important to keep in mind.

00:08:11.975 --> 00:08:23.559
And also the news, news editors oftentimes decide what to, oftentimes decide what to post and what to report on.

00:08:23.559 --> 00:08:28.298
You know, based on what people are talking about and what they're watching.

00:08:28.298 --> 00:08:42.586
If no one watched the sub, the sub disaster unfold, cnn would not be covering it And the New York Times would not have, you know, frequent, minute by minute updates of what happened.

00:08:42.586 --> 00:08:52.605
The reason why they were doing it is because people wanted that information And it is a business And I had also said on a number of lives as well is the press did cover the migrant disaster.

00:08:52.605 --> 00:08:55.982
I was watching it, i was, i was familiar with it and I was definitely following it.

00:08:56.735 --> 00:09:02.525
But the complaints do bring up, you know, an important part of what the press does cover.

00:09:02.525 --> 00:09:09.940
You know, if there are communication theories, there's the agenda setting theory, which involves news and news coverage.

00:09:09.940 --> 00:09:15.464
It's when an editor decides what is news, do they set an agenda?

00:09:15.464 --> 00:09:17.226
And they can do that.

00:09:17.226 --> 00:09:20.716
You know absolutely An example of an agenda setting theory This is.

00:09:20.716 --> 00:09:45.666
This is fictitious, i'm coming up with this, but this would be if the Washington Post all of a sudden, during the sub story, decided to write a, decided to write a piece justifying why billionaires want to go to extreme measures for fun, for hobby and for exploration.

00:09:45.666 --> 00:09:53.527
One might accuse the Washington Post of setting an agenda there.

00:09:53.527 --> 00:09:57.124
There'd be agenda setting theory in play.

00:09:57.124 --> 00:09:57.524
Why?

00:09:57.524 --> 00:10:04.124
Because Jeff Bezos owns the Washington Post, so one could think maybe he would come down and say you have to write a piece.

00:10:04.124 --> 00:10:13.544
You know we cannot taint this idea of exploration, because that is really the topic, you know, of the podcast this week.

00:10:13.586 --> 00:10:14.494
I want to talk about the PR.

00:10:14.494 --> 00:10:25.458
I want to talk about the reputation, not really about the facts, because we all know the facts, but watching the names and the brands and the companies that were involved was interesting as well.

00:10:25.458 --> 00:10:30.404
So, quickly, i just want to go through, you know, some of the, some of the good.

00:10:30.404 --> 00:10:42.461
You know the strategies that I saw in this and some of the worst ones that I saw for the purpose of people you know who work in comms and people who you know work in public relations, public affairs, communications, leadership.

00:10:42.461 --> 00:10:47.804
This, this crisis or this disaster, to me was a bit of a throwback.

00:10:48.895 --> 00:11:08.782
I worked in news and I worked on the other side, public affairs as well, back in the 90s and the early 2000s, and this story just harken back to a time before social media, before we had extra coverage, extra sources to kind of color and build a story.

00:11:08.782 --> 00:11:22.245
Back in the 90s we didn't have social media And I compared it to a time when I was reporting on JFK Jr's plane that was lost off the waters of Martha's Vineyard, just off of Woods Hole.

00:11:22.245 --> 00:11:24.977
There wasn't social media, there wasn't video.

00:11:24.977 --> 00:11:31.219
You know, there wasn't someone filming JFK Jr as he drove into New Jersey to get into his plane.

00:11:31.219 --> 00:11:34.163
The coverage wasn't there.

00:11:34.163 --> 00:11:44.797
It was a plane that took off when it was sunset, it was foggy, which I absolutely remember, the foggy weather that day, except I lived in Cape Cod And then poof, it was gone.

00:11:44.797 --> 00:11:48.398
So there wasn't any color, if you will.

00:11:48.437 --> 00:11:51.014
From a news point of view, there wasn't anything to show.

00:11:51.014 --> 00:11:53.740
There wasn't B-roll, just the only B-roll that was out.

00:11:53.740 --> 00:11:58.301
There was just an ocean, and this story, the sub-story, was so similar to that.

00:11:58.301 --> 00:12:02.200
Okay, so some of the strategies that I saw that were interesting to me.

00:12:02.200 --> 00:12:07.570
So let's look at some of the good ones Now there was transparency and timely communication.

00:12:07.750 --> 00:12:21.846
One of the things that I did notice right away is when, as soon as I found out about the story, i had posted this on social media that I immediately went to Twitter to look for real-time information from Ocean Gate.

00:12:21.846 --> 00:12:31.480
They had an older tweet, an older pinned tweet, up there And so that was dated, but they did replace it with updated information.

00:12:31.480 --> 00:12:51.590
I think that took a day or two to do that, but one of the things that they did do right away that I noticed when I looked at the news coverage and CBS News was the first, i believe, that I noticed that had information, that they were actually confirmed that there were tourists on that submersible And they got that information directly from Ocean Gate.

00:12:51.590 --> 00:12:57.342
So that is one piece of it, that Ocean Gate wasn't hiding anything.

00:12:57.342 --> 00:13:00.590
They did speak with the press and they put the information out there.

00:13:00.590 --> 00:13:05.667
It wasn't as timely as it could have been, but there was transparency there right away.

00:13:05.667 --> 00:13:14.144
So when the story hit breaking news, there was an Ocean Gate response right out the gate.

00:13:14.144 --> 00:13:18.360
Also the US Coast Guard they were on this as well.

00:13:18.360 --> 00:13:23.902
I mean, they handled the press relations pretty well.

00:13:23.902 --> 00:13:25.835
Like I said, it was out of the first district.

00:13:25.835 --> 00:13:28.998
It was not out of headquarters, which is out of Washington DC, it was out of Boston.

00:13:28.998 --> 00:13:39.562
Their Twitter page was very active with updates, so everyone knew that that was the agency and that was the district, the first district that was involved.

00:13:39.910 --> 00:13:51.462
Now another good part of the media strategy is, i think, through all of this, everyone involved demonstrated empathy and concern For the five people on board.

00:13:51.462 --> 00:13:57.256
That's immersive, submersible, even though we had billionaires on there.

00:13:57.256 --> 00:14:03.328
This was an extreme exploration hobby at really at its finest or its worst.

00:14:03.328 --> 00:14:09.570
You wouldn't notice in the news coverage that there was any type of bias towards that or commentary.

00:14:09.570 --> 00:14:16.484
There was definitely commentary on social media, for sure, but there was definitely empathy and care.

00:14:16.484 --> 00:14:22.700
The coverage for these very wealthy people and one of their sons, a 19-year-old son.

00:14:22.700 --> 00:14:27.769
It felt similar coverage if anyone was on board, not just billionaires.

00:14:27.769 --> 00:14:34.590
So I thought that piece of it was quite good in terms of the coverage.

00:14:34.590 --> 00:15:01.590
The Coast Guard and their messaging expressed sincere empathy, as did Oceangate and their messaging showing concern for the passengers, though we did not know that one of the passengers at that time was the CEO of Oceangate and also the husband of the wife who also worked for Oceangate, who apparently is the head of communications for the company and was also one of the people on the boat.

00:15:02.471 --> 00:15:12.590
Now, the other piece that I think that was good is in terms of what we saw in terms of the coverage and the press relations on this.

00:15:12.590 --> 00:15:17.522
The media relations was leveraging social media experts.

00:15:17.522 --> 00:15:24.288
You noticed that in the press conferences with the Coast Guard, they brought other people in.

00:15:24.288 --> 00:15:32.923
They had someone from the UK, since we had someone from the UK who was on board.

00:15:32.923 --> 00:15:35.760
There was definitely.

00:15:35.760 --> 00:15:37.590
It was a multi-agency effort.

00:15:37.590 --> 00:15:56.072
You never got the sense that it was only one agency that was calling the shots on this, and now that we've learned that the agencies knew more than the public knew, that's going to segue us into the worst media strategies that we saw here Now.

00:15:56.172 --> 00:16:00.466
In the environment that we're in in 2023, so much of news coverage happens online.

00:16:00.466 --> 00:16:21.302
That's just how it is Gone are the days of people just sitting and looking at televisions and waiting for breaking news, although that happened, but many people, i would bet if you're listening to me right now, you are probably following this on your phone or following it on your laptop, and if you watch the press conference with the Coast Guard, you watched it on your laptop.

00:16:21.302 --> 00:16:25.301
You watched the online version because a lot of people were covering it.

00:16:25.301 --> 00:16:35.565
So, from a news coverage point of view, what you could take away from this is how critical social media is when it comes to media relations, particularly in a crisis situation.

00:16:35.565 --> 00:16:46.980
That's where people are A newspaper, if it comes out once a day, i don't even know does anyone have twice a day editions anymore An afternoon, an afternoon, a morning, an afternoon?

00:16:46.980 --> 00:16:47.620
I don't think so.

00:16:47.620 --> 00:16:54.582
But you know, and even cable news, or watching cable news, but so much of it is driven by social.

00:16:55.152 --> 00:16:58.844
Now, what made that piece somewhat sticky?

00:16:58.844 --> 00:17:00.590
because there's a lot of information out there.

00:17:00.590 --> 00:17:08.569
There's a lot of people talking, a lot of people asking questions, but we had somewhat of a transparency problem as well.

00:17:08.569 --> 00:17:16.500
So, even though Ocean Gate and the Coast Guard came out right away and they were transparent with information, they were not transparent with.

00:17:16.500 --> 00:17:31.223
The biggest news in this entire story is that most people affiliated with the company and the agencies and the entities that were involved in the search, they all knew that the the implosion happened on Sunday.

00:17:31.223 --> 00:17:32.432
They all knew it.

00:17:32.432 --> 00:17:35.136
They sat on the information.

00:17:36.155 --> 00:17:39.954
Now, it's not a conspiracy theorist here.

00:17:39.954 --> 00:17:41.730
There's many things that could be at play.

00:17:41.730 --> 00:17:54.211
They needed to determine likely, they needed to determine how it was going to be revealed that there was a catastrophic implosion, even though it was picked up.

00:17:54.211 --> 00:18:17.814
The implosion was picked up on Sonar, apparently, And the Navy had indicated that they were familiar, that they knew that this had happened on Sunday, but the fact that so many people knew about it and kept it under wraps, they probably knew, from a search and recovery aspect, what they needed to do to confirm what happened.

00:18:17.814 --> 00:18:24.273
So when that hovercraft came to put down the Sonars, i believe they knew exactly where they were going.

00:18:24.273 --> 00:18:30.912
They knew exactly where it was And went bloop And they knew what they needed to find and that's where they could find the wreckage.

00:18:30.912 --> 00:18:44.278
So there was a narrative that was crafted for the public And I had said on one of my TikToks it seemed a little calculated.

00:18:45.025 --> 00:18:47.224
It seemed a little calculated but I don't know who did that Like.

00:18:47.224 --> 00:18:49.373
I do not know who would be the mastermind behind that.

00:18:49.373 --> 00:18:51.792
I mean certainly the agencies.

00:18:51.792 --> 00:18:59.154
You have the Coast Guard and the Navy and the Canadian Coast Guard and the entities coming over from France and the IMO.

00:18:59.154 --> 00:19:00.871
Everyone is involved in this.

00:19:00.871 --> 00:19:02.651
There's such a maritime element of it.

00:19:02.651 --> 00:19:05.133
They had to keep that news under wrap.

00:19:05.133 --> 00:19:09.528
But what I found so fascinating is the no one in news.

00:19:09.528 --> 00:19:19.174
At least from what I can tell, and I was looking no one was coming out with a storyline about people knowing on Sunday.

00:19:19.174 --> 00:19:22.871
Like, shouldn't we have known on Sunday for the amount of people who knew?

00:19:22.871 --> 00:19:28.847
So not only do we not have that information, we also had this.

00:19:29.208 --> 00:19:38.064
Next, this additional narrative of Banging.

00:19:38.064 --> 00:19:42.351
When that story went live, i happened to see it right away.

00:19:42.351 --> 00:19:49.952
I was online when I saw it, or I was doing it live, i think, when it came out And I quoted it from the independent that there was banging.

00:19:49.952 --> 00:19:59.009
And then how long did that banging narrative stay out there, when people already knew it could not be true, It was impossible.

00:19:59.009 --> 00:20:03.114
And then once we hear begging, i mean talk about a storyline in a movie.

00:20:03.114 --> 00:20:04.166
Is it possible?

00:20:04.166 --> 00:20:09.948
they're all in there in this tank the size of a minivan and someone's banging.

00:20:09.948 --> 00:20:15.692
And then people said, well, it's the universal sign for distress, for SOS, for submariners.

00:20:15.692 --> 00:20:17.009
It was crazy.

00:20:17.009 --> 00:20:20.875
But no one no one who knew stopped that narrative.

00:20:20.875 --> 00:20:21.667
They let it go.

00:20:22.744 --> 00:20:35.434
Also, the oxygen they knew that the oxygen was running at a certain time, that it was going to run out at a certain time, news coverage was allowed to continue with that narrative.

00:20:35.434 --> 00:20:38.632
They had oxygen watch clocks.

00:20:38.632 --> 00:20:40.130
You know how much oxygen was left?

00:20:40.130 --> 00:20:42.471
Now I mean we have to know.

00:20:42.471 --> 00:20:56.797
And because it wasn't uncovered and because no one reported on it, the molly me says people knew, like likely, even in the media, the press, they knew as well.

00:20:56.797 --> 00:20:58.471
Like someone had editors had to know.

00:20:58.471 --> 00:21:00.269
People know nothing gets covered.

00:21:00.269 --> 00:21:04.474
So maybe they were encouraged to keep that going.

00:21:04.474 --> 00:21:12.778
Now what would be the incentive to keep a narrative of diminishing, depleting oxygen by the hour?

00:21:12.778 --> 00:21:26.493
It's so, hollywood, because you're going to get people gripped, people watching, and not only are they just going to like, watch and kind of tune in, keep watching, keep watching.

00:21:26.493 --> 00:21:30.253
So this was quite a boon for the press.

00:21:30.253 --> 00:21:35.308
So there was probably some buy-in there too to keep people there.

00:21:36.705 --> 00:21:44.351
This drama as it unfolded, it unfolded over days, so this was days of wall-to-wall coverage.

00:21:44.351 --> 00:21:46.244
So think about that Now.

00:21:46.244 --> 00:21:48.051
Think about that from a business point of view.

00:21:48.051 --> 00:21:55.394
Okay, so that lack of transparency may have been a part of a bigger strategy.

00:21:55.394 --> 00:21:58.252
So also the second piece of it.

00:21:58.625 --> 00:22:00.352
There was a lack of media engagement.

00:22:00.352 --> 00:22:01.430
I mean certainly with Ocean Gate.

00:22:01.430 --> 00:22:03.853
I mean they just shut down, after they had that statement.

00:22:03.853 --> 00:22:07.193
Their website even crashed or they took their website down.

00:22:07.193 --> 00:22:14.135
They didn't want people going in there and digging for more facts to find out bad things about these expeditions.

00:22:14.135 --> 00:22:22.094
So there was a lack of media engagement in terms of spokespeople.

00:22:22.305 --> 00:22:27.633
Now it's understandable why Ocean Gate wouldn't be able to provide a spokesperson.

00:22:27.633 --> 00:22:40.412
I think it's reasonable without me I don't really know this, but that size of the company probably everyone who could be a spokesperson was probably on that boat or the CEO, who usually the face of that company.

00:22:40.412 --> 00:22:42.971
He was dead on Sunday.

00:22:42.971 --> 00:22:48.871
So when you're leader in, your primary spokesperson is taken out of the game.

00:22:48.871 --> 00:22:51.211
Now you're scrambling to find out who's doing it.

00:22:51.211 --> 00:22:58.550
Now, if the director of communication is the wife of Saxton Rush, the CEO who's on the sub, well, she can't be a spokesperson either.

00:22:58.550 --> 00:23:04.047
So there's probably a lot of scrambling And there's probably not much to say anyway to go on to.

00:23:04.086 --> 00:23:07.211
You know, because there's so much scrutiny with that company anyway.

00:23:07.211 --> 00:23:12.236
But that should not be a playbook to follow for any company.

00:23:12.236 --> 00:23:20.311
It's understandable why Ocean Gate for as limited of the resources they likely had, but no other company should ever be that silent.

00:23:20.311 --> 00:23:23.692
So that would be a bad media strategy there.

00:23:23.692 --> 00:23:26.732
Also, the limited social media presence.

00:23:26.732 --> 00:23:28.690
Like I said, their website went down.

00:23:28.690 --> 00:23:31.712
Their weren't tweets, their weren't posts.

00:23:31.712 --> 00:23:33.451
They did update a pin tweet.

00:23:33.451 --> 00:23:35.971
I had mentioned the pin tweet earlier.

00:23:38.105 --> 00:23:42.672
An important aspect of media relations in the social media age is a pin tweet.

00:23:42.672 --> 00:23:46.990
A pin tweet is what you put at the top of a social media feed all the social media.

00:23:46.990 --> 00:23:48.397
Wait, does TikTok?

00:23:48.397 --> 00:23:58.771
I don't know TikTok has pinned tweets or pinned, i don't even know but I know Facebook does And the purpose behind it is it's the real estate that everyone looks at first.

00:23:58.771 --> 00:24:11.099
So if it is a crisis and you are an organization dealing with a crisis, whatever your statement is, you're going to pin that tweet, because every time someone replies to something that might be pushed down, but if someone goes to your page, they're going to see it right there.

00:24:12.061 --> 00:24:20.119
It took a while for them to remove a pinned tweet which was thanking their partner, starlink, for their successful tie-tap.

00:24:20.119 --> 00:24:22.099
It's a successful Titanic expedition.

00:24:22.099 --> 00:24:30.099
Starlink is owned by, run by SpaceX, owned by Elon Musk.

00:24:30.099 --> 00:24:33.256
So that way and is that interesting that Elon Musk?

00:24:33.256 --> 00:24:34.119
We never heard about Elon Musk?

00:24:34.119 --> 00:24:41.029
We never heard about Starlink at all in the story, yet His company was the one that was involved in the communication.

00:24:41.029 --> 00:24:48.079
So what we don't want to follow in any type of a crisis is having a website shut down and have it crash.

00:24:48.079 --> 00:24:52.766
That's where you want to put your statement is on your website and a pinned tweet, if you can.

00:24:52.766 --> 00:24:56.465
You want it in both places And also by using social media.

00:24:56.465 --> 00:24:58.971
It's a way where you don't have to deal with reporters directly.

00:24:59.721 --> 00:25:06.099
I had mentioned on my one of my TikToks that CBS News clearly was able to get a hold of someone at Ocean Gate.

00:25:06.099 --> 00:25:10.119
So they, i believe, if I remember correctly, they had a direct source.

00:25:10.119 --> 00:25:19.119
So they had a direct quote from someone at Ocean Gate where everyone else was quoting off of that And so really, in a crisis, especially for a company like that, they should not be picking up the phone.

00:25:19.119 --> 00:25:23.288
That's where a website could come in All right, so quickly.

00:25:23.288 --> 00:25:25.038
Some of the things to highlight in there as well.

00:25:25.038 --> 00:25:26.505
So I talked about the news.

00:25:27.503 --> 00:25:29.119
Now think about the station that you went to to watch it.

00:25:29.119 --> 00:25:30.665
Now me, i went to CNN.

00:25:30.665 --> 00:25:33.099
I always think that they're right in the middle.

00:25:33.099 --> 00:25:35.487
They weren't for a bit when Chris Licht was there.

00:25:35.487 --> 00:25:37.030
But who, what, who?

00:25:37.030 --> 00:25:38.213
Who?

00:25:38.213 --> 00:25:45.119
Chris Licht, remember him Only from two weeks ago, the Atlantic profile, and he was gone by Monday.

00:25:45.119 --> 00:25:49.050
The former CEO and chairman of CNN out.

00:25:49.050 --> 00:25:56.119
Think about the horrible press that CNN had just two weeks ago And now BAFO ratings.

00:25:56.119 --> 00:25:58.406
Think anyone is thinking about Chris Licht.

00:25:58.406 --> 00:26:07.079
Well, other than us right now, no one was a boon for CNN and also Washington Post, new York Times, you know, with the running information.

00:26:07.079 --> 00:26:11.317
So this was a good story for the press.

00:26:11.317 --> 00:26:19.099
They did move aside, like I said, the Mediterranean migrant boat boat disaster was not a leading story anymore And the sub story definitely was.

00:26:19.099 --> 00:26:29.071
It just was good for the plot as, as they say Now, also some of the other sub threads that were happening in the story.

00:26:29.603 --> 00:26:32.119
There was the brands that were involved.

00:26:32.119 --> 00:26:34.119
There was Boeing, boeing and University of Washington.

00:26:34.119 --> 00:26:39.864
Both had to come out, deny being involved With this with the sub, with the sub.

00:26:39.864 --> 00:27:04.667
The CEO, stockton, russia at one time had bragged about both University of Washington and Boeing's involvement in that sub And he had said it wasn't MacGyver'd, which is from the TV show MacGyver, where you know he would take like tape and candy floss and you know, put stuff together Candy floss, dental floss Wait, did they call it?

00:27:04.667 --> 00:27:07.803
they may have called it candy floss at one time, cotton candy, whatever, i don't know why.

00:27:07.803 --> 00:27:12.667
I was going to that Anyway, but they had to come out and deny that and they had to distance themselves.

00:27:12.667 --> 00:27:14.511
Is it true, who knows?

00:27:14.511 --> 00:27:19.070
I mean he said it but we don't know if the truth is there, but they became a part of the story.

00:27:19.070 --> 00:27:21.919
Also part of the story was Logitech.

00:27:21.919 --> 00:27:26.955
That was the controller that they used in the sub.

00:27:26.955 --> 00:27:34.411
It was a game controller And he had oh, we have a couple of them here If this one happens to shut down, oh my goodness, they had noodles in there.

00:27:34.411 --> 00:27:38.009
So all these brands are a part of it.

00:27:38.201 --> 00:27:41.119
Another brand, which is really a band Blink 182.

00:27:41.119 --> 00:27:43.067
How did they get involved?

00:27:43.067 --> 00:27:51.111
The stepson of one of the people on board, hamish, which I had said on the live.

00:27:51.111 --> 00:27:57.078
Whenever I see wherever I hear the name Hamish, his name was Hamish Harding, but Hamish, the name Hamish.

00:27:57.078 --> 00:27:58.079
I asked my Tiktok live.

00:27:58.079 --> 00:28:10.417
Does anyone know a movie in the 90s that came out where the character Hamish Someone on the live knew A couple did for weddings in a funeral Andy McDowell's character, the older Scottish gentleman.

00:28:10.417 --> 00:28:11.000
His name was Hamish.

00:28:11.000 --> 00:28:13.448
It's how Molly's brain works.

00:28:13.448 --> 00:28:26.054
His stepson, brian Saz, was kind of all over the place, so he went to a Blink 182 concert and then defended himself at the Blink 182 concert.

00:28:26.054 --> 00:28:28.079
He was posting to Instagram.

00:28:28.079 --> 00:28:32.650
He was posting to Instagram stories, so he's audio guy 182.

00:28:32.650 --> 00:28:36.891
So clearly, blink 182 is incredibly important to him.

00:28:36.891 --> 00:28:58.692
So he had said that his dad had wanted him, his stepfather would have wanted him to be at that concert And also some of the other threads, like, there was a writer from The Simpsons who had done numerous trips, several trips on that sub, and there was, of course, a Simpsons episode where they're on a sub.

00:29:00.682 --> 00:29:06.616
It's incredible because on a live I was finding that out And the last live that I did was all over the place because we were talking about Blink 182.

00:29:06.616 --> 00:29:14.048
We were talking about The Simpsons and Kathy Griffin was on the live And Rosie O'Donnell was on it briefly too.

00:29:14.048 --> 00:29:16.988
I mean it became like this crazy, free for all of information.

00:29:16.988 --> 00:29:17.931
It was fantastic.

00:29:17.931 --> 00:29:20.099
I mean everybody was throwing information there.

00:29:20.099 --> 00:29:31.365
And that's when I found out, too, that the wife of the CEO of Ocean Gate was the director of communication and her grandparents, her great, great, great great, i think.

00:29:31.365 --> 00:29:32.871
I think it was four times.

00:29:33.815 --> 00:29:34.577
They were in the Titanic.

00:29:34.617 --> 00:29:35.119
They died in the Titanic.

00:29:35.119 --> 00:29:36.999
They were first class passengers.

00:29:36.999 --> 00:29:41.099
They were the Ira Strauss, ira and Eva Strauss.

00:29:41.099 --> 00:29:48.119
They were passengers, which could explain this fascination with the Titanic.

00:29:48.119 --> 00:29:55.616
Also, in terms of brands that were tied in we had.

00:29:55.616 --> 00:30:05.779
There was the CBS story, david Pog's story where he went in there in that sub itself And they showed even on film how they had lost contact in there.

00:30:05.779 --> 00:30:09.328
So that was actually a very good piece to have.

00:30:09.328 --> 00:30:09.869
You know.

00:30:09.869 --> 00:30:11.982
For CBS That was a great news hit.

00:30:11.982 --> 00:30:19.346
The fact that they had that footage to come in and discuss that That was great for CBS.

00:30:19.346 --> 00:30:38.970
But the other person who chimed in who probably could not help himself, was James Cameron, james Cameron being the director of Titanic And then also he was on an interview, an ABC News interview, with Bill Lipoff and also Robert Ballard, so he was the first person to locate the Titanic wreckage.

00:30:38.970 --> 00:30:43.209
So he's been forever associated with that.

00:30:43.209 --> 00:30:52.672
But if you were to listen to James Cameron, i would say this is a clip of James Cameron being a James Cameron.

00:30:52.672 --> 00:30:53.502
Take a listen.

00:30:54.880 --> 00:31:05.670
I had deep concerns about the technology that they were using, composite fiber wound filament hull, which I don't believe has any place in deep submergence.

00:31:05.670 --> 00:31:09.770
And I know a thing or two about you know the engineering that goes into subs.

00:31:09.770 --> 00:31:20.432
I designed and built my own sub and went, you know, at 1.10 years ago, went three times deeper than Titanic at the Challenger Deep.

00:31:21.019 --> 00:31:25.830
Wouldn't you just love to sit down with James Cameron and find out exactly how it feels?

00:31:25.830 --> 00:31:30.250
Guess what You don't need to, because that was definitely coming out.

00:31:30.250 --> 00:31:34.851
There's a reason why James Cameron has the rap that he has.

00:31:34.851 --> 00:31:36.503
You could tell he was probably.

00:31:36.503 --> 00:31:41.748
He probably just wanted to come out and blast that CEO, stockton Rush.

00:31:41.748 --> 00:31:43.384
He just seems so spiteful.

00:31:43.384 --> 00:31:44.982
In that interview.

00:31:44.982 --> 00:31:54.833
What it seemed like to me is James Cameron who was pissed that someone ruined the brand of exploration.

00:31:54.833 --> 00:31:58.990
Because now James Cameron ever wants to go down there or any other explorer?

00:31:58.990 --> 00:32:01.887
This is the story that it's going to be about.

00:32:01.887 --> 00:32:05.469
It will be forever associated with Ocean Gate.

00:32:05.469 --> 00:32:09.588
So James Cameron is not happy because of all these people.

00:32:09.588 --> 00:32:12.806
Talking about the money and the wealth down there for what purpose?

00:32:12.806 --> 00:32:17.184
doesn't make him look good, but he could not have looked any worse anyway.

00:32:17.184 --> 00:32:26.862
But based on previous previous thoughts about James Cameron like this one from Amy Poehler, Catherine.

00:32:26.882 --> 00:32:28.026
Bigelow nominated tonight.

00:32:28.026 --> 00:32:35.190
haven't really been following the controversy over Zero Dark Thirty, but when it comes to torture, i trust the lady who spent three years married to James Cameron.

00:32:38.262 --> 00:32:53.690
I had to tie it up with a Hollywood clip because really, this entire story felt like we were watching a movie, like we were watching a drama Well, it's 2023, like we were watching a six episode streamer.

00:32:53.690 --> 00:33:13.092
About this, i mean, there was every element of a good story, a gripping story, a compelling story But in the end it was a tragic story, and particularly for the 19 year old, if reports are to be believed, that he didn't even want to go on this trip.

00:33:13.092 --> 00:33:14.727
So that's very sad.

00:33:14.727 --> 00:33:21.607
So still, regardless of how people feel about billionaires and their extreme sports and their hobbies, five lives were lost.

00:33:21.607 --> 00:33:27.932
So in the end, it was very tragic, but lessons to be learned, particularly if you're a communicator.

00:33:27.932 --> 00:33:44.628
So every episode, i leave an indestructible PR tip and that is one easy to remember, take away to help you build your indestructible reputation, whether it's you as a person or as a business, and it is this Any crisis can come with an element of surprise.

00:33:45.121 --> 00:33:46.306
Many happen that way.

00:33:46.306 --> 00:33:52.172
That's why it is very, very important that you have some type of crisis communication plan.

00:33:52.172 --> 00:33:57.951
You can head over to my website if you need a crisis communication plan, because I have one online.

00:33:57.951 --> 00:34:01.209
I recently conducted a course.

00:34:01.209 --> 00:34:08.632
It was it was a live session And then it also came with a template, like boilerplate, for a crisis communication plan.

00:34:08.632 --> 00:34:21.713
If you need one, head over to my website, molly McPhersoncom, and you can find it there right off of the homepage Or those link in the show notes as well on the video and in the podcast.

00:34:21.713 --> 00:34:29.474
Also, i did want to mention I do have a blog post about a minimal crisis plan that you can use.

00:34:29.474 --> 00:34:40.692
Let's say, you don't want to have a full fledged one, you don't have the resources, you don't have a time, you don't have the time, but in one document you can write down a very, very simple plan 10 steps.

00:34:41.219 --> 00:34:45.630
And if you want to head over to a new platform that I'm using, it's called five.

00:34:45.630 --> 00:34:55.614
So if you head over to fiveme backslash Molly McPherson links in show notes, you will see my new community.

00:34:55.614 --> 00:34:59.088
I've switched over from Patreon over to five.

00:34:59.088 --> 00:35:00.105
Five is a new company.

00:35:00.105 --> 00:35:02.280
They just launched in January They.

00:35:03.643 --> 00:35:08.793
This is a platform that is more for this kind of user generated content.

00:35:08.793 --> 00:35:16.829
It allows you know, allows a community to interact, and one of the reasons why I made that switch is because it's driven on questions.

00:35:16.829 --> 00:35:21.570
If you have any type of question that you want to ask me something that you've heard in this podcast.

00:35:21.570 --> 00:35:23.072
Head on over to that site.

00:35:23.072 --> 00:35:23.884
You can log in.

00:35:23.884 --> 00:35:28.851
There is a free membership there that you can just log in and ask a question.

00:35:28.851 --> 00:35:35.052
They'll send you a summary each week if you want you know via email about some of the questions that were asked.

00:35:35.052 --> 00:35:42.554
It's just a different look on a community in a different way for me to be able to serve you, the listener and the viewer.

00:35:42.554 --> 00:35:46.929
So if you want to head over there also, again, the link is in the show notes.

00:35:46.929 --> 00:35:50.409
That's all for this week on the podcast.

00:35:50.409 --> 00:35:52.907
Thanks for listening and for watching.

00:35:52.907 --> 00:35:54.146
Bye for now.