Today, on the Indestructible PR podcast, we respond to a listener question about crisis leadership among incumbents and successors.
A listener wants to know if there are any key distinctions in the guidance for crisis communication by leaders who swept in after an incident (where no individuals associated with the crisis are still involved) versus crisis communication that comes from the leadership responsible at the time of the crisis.
Tuning in, you’ll hear a bit more information about how this question came about, why the specific details of the incident in question are not important, and why it makes for such a challenging situation. To find out what happens when the mess of prior leadership is left to be handled by the successor and how to salvage the trust of key stakeholders, tune in today!
Key Points From This Episode:
Tweetables:
“If you do not show care from leadership, you’re going to lose something valuable, something [that is] indispensable in a crisis, and that is trust .” — @MollyMcPherson [0:04:45]
“[Trust] will remain if you meet [the] expectation of your stakeholders, but the trust will plummet if stakeholders feel betrayed, if the press senses that you are shaking in your conviction and shaking in your values.” — @MollyMcPherson [0:04:58]
“When it comes to crisis leadership among incumbents and successors, remember: do not pass the buck. Do not blame the predecessor. Use the change in regime to make changes and leverage those changes to regain the trust of your stakeholders.” — @MollyMcPherson [0:07:57]
Links Mentioned in Today’s Episode:
© 2022 Indestructible PR
Join Molly on Patreon for even deeper dives into celebrity PR strategies and exclusive live sessions!
Follow Molly for daily updates and more PR insights:
© 2024 The PR Breakdown with Molly McPherson